ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-review-dt] Attendance list and mp3 GNSO Review WP 30 September 2015 at 18:00 UTC

  • To: "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Attendance list and mp3 GNSO Review WP 30 September 2015 at 18:00 UTC
  • From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:28:29 +0000

Dear all,

Please find attendance and mp3 mp3 below for the GNSO Review WP call held on 
Wednesday, 30 September 2015 at 18:00 UTC.

MP3: 
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-30sep15-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXzI03ZqpsuY9wrGau7j7-2FGTvAekFr2qqt-2FstPOjadxtHP-2Bis4UcRg-3D-3D_QuA5zZR9ZZ7J1F2FeF-2FOsgm1hgIDcBrAX2P7Ezxmql7ckJc4ios1-2BxObAoz2rzLSI3c4QB1NGo7bw7XrBjpRCbz74w4vzk48UxZMFoBBQBQaQ0ePdiOjdJ30sQNHkokOf-2F2p-2FBvMgKvMhzp-2B4u8fP-2BRrSytHe2KCf2HpQmtSbpezMgNTUG57PiORAPesOotpHA-2BC4pSmXJRsVmpbNaLqzkFpNPLoqtdngS-2BBzOHOiYBAd62i-2FdDwF6fK0AVCtq-2Fzsn8HA4OhtTrVv6E-2FugLUNHgdVY6-2BnwCoq0dO7dNfq5ttqLrnjhbdxbFbcg-2Be8RPSehC4aBth4wS5HNWqNM3gVE4AF3C-2FsCXkUHdU2yTTOSeBwCg4U5cPxDuqJhxrzs9V-2BJQKAcahlQNKk-2BppOE7YqTweRSsnTHLAqfjN0OCTEfDMt7XZndweBA61JUO8-2FYr4XcRY9G-2Bte9zOZyzSu-2FyLkylwZ8vJ6akhpSxM6s7-2BhVB8APhw52CJRPwz1qiGQZmG>


Attendance:
Avri Doria
Chuck Gomes
David Maher
Jeff Neuman
Jen Wolfe
Klaus Stoll
Stephanie Perrin
Rudi Vansnick

Apologies:
Amr Elsadr
Bill Drake


Staff:
Larisa Gurnick,
Charla Shambley
Terri Agnew
Nathalie Peregrine

Thanks!
Nathalie



AC Chat:

Nathalie  Peregrine:Dear all, Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Party on the 
30 September 2015
  Chuck Gomes:I like the odds of RySG influence on this call!  :)
  Avri Doria:hmmm
  Klaus Stoll:Rudi will join the call in a minute
  Klaus Stoll:You can ask him,.
  Avri Doria:makes sense to me
  Klaus Stoll:I have technical problems to talk, sorry about that
  Nathalie  Peregrine:Stephanie Perrin has joined the call
  Stephanie Perrin:Apologies for being late
  Nathalie  Peregrine:Rudi Vansnick has joined the call
  Nathalie  Peregrine:URL of the document showing: 
https://community.icann.org/x/SptYAw
  Rudi Vansnick:sorry had to run away from another meeting to join this one
  Larisa Gurnick:https://community.icann.org/x/SptYAw
  Larisa Gurnick:here is the link to the wiki
  Larisa Gurnick:We can add another column to capture Chuck's point
  Marika Konings:It would also be necessary to document outreach strategies (in 
order to measure)
  Chuck Gomes:@ Stephanie:  Should we change it to hard?
  Rudi Vansnick:agree with Stephanie
  Marika Konings:The WG focuses on metrics for policy development
  Stephanie Perrin:Maybe ....I dont think it would be easy
  Klaus Stoll:We need do determine how we define outreach
  Rudi Vansnick:some work is alreadygoing on in some constituencies on the 
level if messuring outreach resutls
  Stephanie Perrin:Yes I dont think this is a priority for this group
  Klaus Stoll:Are we talk out corporate ICANN centered outreach or are we 
talking about community centered outreach
  Rudi Vansnick:ok with community centered
  Rudi Vansnick:still we are quite different groups in the  GNSO
  Klaus Stoll:I just wanted to be clear, Thanks
  Larisa Gurnick:Let me confirm what section 5.4.5 is.  Possibly, the numbering 
was changed by Westlake
  Stephanie Perrin:If we could simply measure the new folks on the PDPs (simple 
count, comparison year to year) we would get useful stats onpotential burnout.  
At the risk of sounding  like I am totally focused on worker bees
  Rudi Vansnick:it thought it was about having more new participants in WG
  Klaus Stoll:To get more participants into WG's you need to do awareness and 
capacity building first
  Stephanie Perrin:True but we have lots of folks who have joined but are not 
engaged.
  Klaus Stoll:Relevance to those who have joined is also a important factor
  Rudi Vansnick:@Chuck : the participants in WG are normally coming from the 
consitutencies
  Rudi Vansnick:so i would consider the efforts should go to them
  Klaus Stoll:Again, you need to do more awareness and capacity building 
through the constituencies first
  Klaus Stoll:Hard
  Rudi Vansnick:medium
  Rudi Vansnick:depending on what budget ICANN wants to allocate
  Rudi Vansnick:not really
  Stephanie Perrin:There is always a limited budget
  Larisa Gurnick:Work currently underway, as defined by staff - GNSO Newcomers 
Webinar, GNSO Learn, Community Travel Support, WG online sign-up tool, 
enhancing volunteers (SO/AC initiative)
  Rudi Vansnick:yes
  Marika Konings:Per Larisa's note, it would be worth to first evaluate what is 
in place to be able to determine what changes / improvements can be made
  Rudi Vansnick:let's not forget there are also a lot of other non PDP WG's 
that needs volunteers
  Marika Konings:It also links to recommendation 1 as you will need to be able 
to measure participation / # of newcomers
  Stephanie Perrin:getting more worker bees seems to me to be a top priority
  Rudi Vansnick:@Stephanie: +1
  Stephanie Perrin:true, and if we do qualtitative research on (for instance) 
the fellows who stay and go on to play active roles, that might be more useful 
than metrics per se.
  Stephanie Perrin:that was in response to Marika
  Stephanie Perrin:I think you could ask folks to rank them....
  Larisa Gurnick:Agreed - not a scientific study, simply a container to 
aggreate people's views
  Larisa Gurnick:How much time would you suggest be allocated to this survey of 
the WP members?
  Larisa Gurnick:Reminder - Doodle poll is still open to assist with scheduling 
the Dublin meeting.  Please respond, if you have not done so already
  Charla Shambley:Link to the doodle poll: 
http://doodle.com/poll/zcigurdm653cwyvv#table
  Rudi Vansnick:@Larisa: so many meetings and not yet having a clear finalised 
Dublin schedule it is not easy to figure out
  Rudi Vansnick:done my poll ;)
  Larisa Gurnick:@Rudi, I realize that.  We are proposing all breakfast 
meetings, hoping that it may be easier to work into your schedules.
  Stephanie Perrin:sorry I had to step away for a moment
  Rudi Vansnick:on Tuesday morning NCSG is presenting to Fellows in the morning
  Stephanie Perrin:Please dont put it on top of the Women's DNS breakfast
  Avri Doria:if the OEC is rejecting the recommendation, why are we dealing 
with it.
  Avri Doria:are we trying to reinstate it?
  Stephanie Perrin:Whether or not the idea has merit, the process is not 
acceptable.
  Rudi Vansnick:so max 2 weeks
  Rudi Vansnick:no objection
  Stephanie Perrin:People are extremely busy at the moment....but if it is easy 
enough we can do it in 2 weeks
  Stephanie Perrin:+1 Chuck
  Rudi Vansnick:no comments fields
  Rudi Vansnick:good idea Larisa
  Rudi Vansnick:very good to hear
  Stephanie Perrin:thanks everyone
  Larisa Gurnick:thank you all
  Chuck Gomes:Thanks Jen & all




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy