<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-review-dt] Attendance list and mp3 GNSO Review WP 30 September 2015 at 18:00 UTC
- To: "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Attendance list and mp3 GNSO Review WP 30 September 2015 at 18:00 UTC
- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 08:28:29 +0000
Dear all,
Please find attendance and mp3 mp3 below for the GNSO Review WP call held on
Wednesday, 30 September 2015 at 18:00 UTC.
MP3:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-30sep15-en.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=NrFWbrBstcrPWP369qgbqlXiSKeL20xnUXzI03ZqpsuY9wrGau7j7-2FGTvAekFr2qqt-2FstPOjadxtHP-2Bis4UcRg-3D-3D_QuA5zZR9ZZ7J1F2FeF-2FOsgm1hgIDcBrAX2P7Ezxmql7ckJc4ios1-2BxObAoz2rzLSI3c4QB1NGo7bw7XrBjpRCbz74w4vzk48UxZMFoBBQBQaQ0ePdiOjdJ30sQNHkokOf-2F2p-2FBvMgKvMhzp-2B4u8fP-2BRrSytHe2KCf2HpQmtSbpezMgNTUG57PiORAPesOotpHA-2BC4pSmXJRsVmpbNaLqzkFpNPLoqtdngS-2BBzOHOiYBAd62i-2FdDwF6fK0AVCtq-2Fzsn8HA4OhtTrVv6E-2FugLUNHgdVY6-2BnwCoq0dO7dNfq5ttqLrnjhbdxbFbcg-2Be8RPSehC4aBth4wS5HNWqNM3gVE4AF3C-2FsCXkUHdU2yTTOSeBwCg4U5cPxDuqJhxrzs9V-2BJQKAcahlQNKk-2BppOE7YqTweRSsnTHLAqfjN0OCTEfDMt7XZndweBA61JUO8-2FYr4XcRY9G-2Bte9zOZyzSu-2FyLkylwZ8vJ6akhpSxM6s7-2BhVB8APhw52CJRPwz1qiGQZmG>
Attendance:
Avri Doria
Chuck Gomes
David Maher
Jeff Neuman
Jen Wolfe
Klaus Stoll
Stephanie Perrin
Rudi Vansnick
Apologies:
Amr Elsadr
Bill Drake
Staff:
Larisa Gurnick,
Charla Shambley
Terri Agnew
Nathalie Peregrine
Thanks!
Nathalie
AC Chat:
Nathalie Peregrine:Dear all, Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Party on the
30 September 2015
Chuck Gomes:I like the odds of RySG influence on this call! :)
Avri Doria:hmmm
Klaus Stoll:Rudi will join the call in a minute
Klaus Stoll:You can ask him,.
Avri Doria:makes sense to me
Klaus Stoll:I have technical problems to talk, sorry about that
Nathalie Peregrine:Stephanie Perrin has joined the call
Stephanie Perrin:Apologies for being late
Nathalie Peregrine:Rudi Vansnick has joined the call
Nathalie Peregrine:URL of the document showing:
https://community.icann.org/x/SptYAw
Rudi Vansnick:sorry had to run away from another meeting to join this one
Larisa Gurnick:https://community.icann.org/x/SptYAw
Larisa Gurnick:here is the link to the wiki
Larisa Gurnick:We can add another column to capture Chuck's point
Marika Konings:It would also be necessary to document outreach strategies (in
order to measure)
Chuck Gomes:@ Stephanie: Should we change it to hard?
Rudi Vansnick:agree with Stephanie
Marika Konings:The WG focuses on metrics for policy development
Stephanie Perrin:Maybe ....I dont think it would be easy
Klaus Stoll:We need do determine how we define outreach
Rudi Vansnick:some work is alreadygoing on in some constituencies on the
level if messuring outreach resutls
Stephanie Perrin:Yes I dont think this is a priority for this group
Klaus Stoll:Are we talk out corporate ICANN centered outreach or are we
talking about community centered outreach
Rudi Vansnick:ok with community centered
Rudi Vansnick:still we are quite different groups in the GNSO
Klaus Stoll:I just wanted to be clear, Thanks
Larisa Gurnick:Let me confirm what section 5.4.5 is. Possibly, the numbering
was changed by Westlake
Stephanie Perrin:If we could simply measure the new folks on the PDPs (simple
count, comparison year to year) we would get useful stats onpotential burnout.
At the risk of sounding like I am totally focused on worker bees
Rudi Vansnick:it thought it was about having more new participants in WG
Klaus Stoll:To get more participants into WG's you need to do awareness and
capacity building first
Stephanie Perrin:True but we have lots of folks who have joined but are not
engaged.
Klaus Stoll:Relevance to those who have joined is also a important factor
Rudi Vansnick:@Chuck : the participants in WG are normally coming from the
consitutencies
Rudi Vansnick:so i would consider the efforts should go to them
Klaus Stoll:Again, you need to do more awareness and capacity building
through the constituencies first
Klaus Stoll:Hard
Rudi Vansnick:medium
Rudi Vansnick:depending on what budget ICANN wants to allocate
Rudi Vansnick:not really
Stephanie Perrin:There is always a limited budget
Larisa Gurnick:Work currently underway, as defined by staff - GNSO Newcomers
Webinar, GNSO Learn, Community Travel Support, WG online sign-up tool,
enhancing volunteers (SO/AC initiative)
Rudi Vansnick:yes
Marika Konings:Per Larisa's note, it would be worth to first evaluate what is
in place to be able to determine what changes / improvements can be made
Rudi Vansnick:let's not forget there are also a lot of other non PDP WG's
that needs volunteers
Marika Konings:It also links to recommendation 1 as you will need to be able
to measure participation / # of newcomers
Stephanie Perrin:getting more worker bees seems to me to be a top priority
Rudi Vansnick:@Stephanie: +1
Stephanie Perrin:true, and if we do qualtitative research on (for instance)
the fellows who stay and go on to play active roles, that might be more useful
than metrics per se.
Stephanie Perrin:that was in response to Marika
Stephanie Perrin:I think you could ask folks to rank them....
Larisa Gurnick:Agreed - not a scientific study, simply a container to
aggreate people's views
Larisa Gurnick:How much time would you suggest be allocated to this survey of
the WP members?
Larisa Gurnick:Reminder - Doodle poll is still open to assist with scheduling
the Dublin meeting. Please respond, if you have not done so already
Charla Shambley:Link to the doodle poll:
http://doodle.com/poll/zcigurdm653cwyvv#table
Rudi Vansnick:@Larisa: so many meetings and not yet having a clear finalised
Dublin schedule it is not easy to figure out
Rudi Vansnick:done my poll ;)
Larisa Gurnick:@Rudi, I realize that. We are proposing all breakfast
meetings, hoping that it may be easier to work into your schedules.
Stephanie Perrin:sorry I had to step away for a moment
Rudi Vansnick:on Tuesday morning NCSG is presenting to Fellows in the morning
Stephanie Perrin:Please dont put it on top of the Women's DNS breakfast
Avri Doria:if the OEC is rejecting the recommendation, why are we dealing
with it.
Avri Doria:are we trying to reinstate it?
Stephanie Perrin:Whether or not the idea has merit, the process is not
acceptable.
Rudi Vansnick:so max 2 weeks
Rudi Vansnick:no objection
Stephanie Perrin:People are extremely busy at the moment....but if it is easy
enough we can do it in 2 weeks
Stephanie Perrin:+1 Chuck
Rudi Vansnick:no comments fields
Rudi Vansnick:good idea Larisa
Rudi Vansnick:very good to hear
Stephanie Perrin:thanks everyone
Larisa Gurnick:thank you all
Chuck Gomes:Thanks Jen & all
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|