ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-review-dt] RE: Initial Survey Results - Feasibility Assessment of 36 Final Recommendations

  • To: "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Initial Survey Results - Feasibility Assessment of 36 Final Recommendations
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:08:38 +0000

Because there is no remote participation, I will not be able to participate in 
this meeting.  So I will share some of my initial thoughts for using the data 
to guide our suggestions regarding the recommendations.



It seems to me that it might make sense to suggest approval of any 
recommendations that came out as a high priority, easy implementation and low 
cost: Rec. #'s 6, 8 & 26.



If we add the rec's that were a high priority, medium difficulty & low cost: 
Rec. #'s 15, 16, & 27



If we add a high priority, medium difficulty and medium cost: Rec. # 2



If we add a medium priority with easy implementation and low cost:  Rec. # 17



If we add medium priority, medium difficulty & low cost:  # 1 & # 14



If we add a medium priority, medium difficulty and Medium cost: # 9 & #13



That would give us 12 recommendations that are at least medium priority, easy 
or medium difficult and low or medium cost.  We could do a quick review of 
those as a group and see if anyone objects to suggesting that those 12 be 
implemented as soon as possible without further review.   That would quickly 
reduce the number of recommendations down to 24.



I have no idea whether this approach makes sense to others but if it does it 
would save us a little time.



We could then look at the rest of the high recommendations that were either 
high difficulty and/or high cost and decide whether we would suggest they be 
implemented right away or in some delayed manner.



We could then review the remaining medium recommendations, etc.



Have a good meeting.



Chuck

________________________________
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] on behalf 
of Larisa B. Gurnick [larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 1:29 PM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Initial Survey Results - Feasibility Assessment of 36 
Final Recommendations

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,
Attached is the Initial Summary of Survey Results based on survey responses you 
submitted reflecting your views on feasibility of implementation of each of the 
36 recommendations.
The attached spread sheet has the following components:

1.       Summary tab – provides a composite for all recommendations, listing 
what appears to be the most prevalent view.

2.       Comments only tab – lists all the free-form comments submitted for 
each recommendation.

3.       1-36 tabs – extract from Survey Monkey of statistics, by 
recommendation where you can see the entire statistical summary

This information reflects 13 responses, of which 11 were complete and 2 
incomplete.  Please note that the number of responders to a given question may 
vary –  responders were free to answer only those questions that they wished.

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey and we hope that you find 
this information useful for your discussion tomorrow as you consider how to 
formulate your feedback and feasibility assessment to the OEC.

Larisa B. Gurnick
Director, Strategic Initiatives
Mobile: 1 310 383-8995
Skype: larisa.gurnick




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy