[gnso-review-dt] Attendance list GNSO Review WP 18 November 2015 at 15:00 UTC

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all,
Please find attendance and AC Chat below for the GNSO Review WP call held on 
Tuesday, 08 December 2015 at 18:00 UTC. The mp3 will be sent later today as we 
have had technical issues with the download. Apologies for the inconvenience. 
The transcription will be posted to the GNSO Master Calendar shortly.
MP3: Provided shortly.
Attendance:
Avri Doria
Chuck Gomes
Jen Wolfe
Rudi Vansnick
Amr Elsadr
David Maher
Pamela Smith
Stephanie Perrin

Apologies: Klaus Stoll

Staff:
Larisa Gurnick,
Marika Konings
Mary Wong
Lars Hoffmann
Glen de St Gery
Charla Shambley
Nathalie Peregrine

Thanks!
Nathalie

AC Chat:

Nathalie  Peregrine:Dear all, Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Party on the 8 
December 2015
  Chuck Gomes:Where's our leader?
  Charla Shambley:Hi Chuck -- I just sent Jen an email.
  Chuck Gomes:Thanks Charla.
  Mary Wong:Please remember to mute your mics if you are not speaking, thank 
you!
  Nathalie  Peregrine:We are looking for the beeping line
  Rudi Vansnick:Klaus Stoll will not be able to join, he has to go seeing the 
doctor
  Nathalie  Peregrine:thanks Rudi, noted
  Amr Elsadr:Apologies. I think that was my line beeping.
  Chuck Gomes:While we are waiting for Jen, would it be helpful to review the 
remaining recommendations?
  Stephanie Perrin:sounds good
  Amr Elsadr:Fine by me.
  Jen Wolfe:My apologies, I did not get the email with the meeting time.
  Nathalie  Peregrine:Avri Doria ha sjoined the ca;l
  Nathalie  Peregrine:call
  Avri Doria:apologies, was in another meeting that went long.
  Nathalie  Peregrine:@ Jen, I will organise a few test emails so we can sort 
out your calendar invite issues
  Amr Elsadr:@Jen: +1
  Rudi Vansnick:agree with Stefanie
  Amr Elsadr:Red sounds good to me on this one.
  Rudi Vansnick:i thought some of the recommendations in 21 are covered by the 
data metrix program running now
  Amr Elsadr:@Rudi: Yes, you may be right. I was fine with those 
recommendations from the DMPM WG. This one seems confusing. :)
  Rudi Vansnick:but that also seems to be an ongoing process
  Rudi Vansnick:is part of the newcomers support and training efforts already 
discussed earlier if i'm not wrong
  Amr Elsadr:@Chuck: Yes..., one would expect this, but you never know.
  Amr Elsadr:There are some lightweight orientation efforts to GNSO WG 
newcomers. Something similar for incoming councillors may not be such a bad 
thing.
  Stephanie Perrin:not hearing anything?
  Stephanie Perrin:yes and the ICANN academy could take on the role to point 
people to relevant training
  Amr Elsadr:Yellow would be OK if we really do agree with their intent. :)
  Amr Elsadr:I'm not entirely sure that we do.
  Stephanie Perrin:yes
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks.
  Rudi Vansnick:i did not find directly the element "technical" in the text 
itself
  Marika Konings:Chuck is correct - it should be also noted that even after the 
first meeting, new volunteers typically come in. The Chair(s) in consultation 
with staff will usually check to make sure that there is sufficient 
representation from the different parts of the ICANN community.
  Amr Elsadr:If I recall correctly, there are procedures that may allow the 
council to terminate a PDP prematurely for specific reasons. Adding these 
standards to a similar practice would be challenging.
  Marika Konings:both at the start of the WG, but also for WG meetings (it 
wouldn't be the first time that calls are cancelled because of lack of 
representation or the chair(s) go back to the Council to encourage additional 
volunteers.
  Rudi Vansnick:looking into the present participation in this WG we already 
see it is difficult to get everyone on it all the time
  Rudi Vansnick:should be part of the charter of each PDP WG
  Amr Elsadr:@Marika: Yes..., very true.
  Rudi Vansnick:correct Stephanie
  Rudi Vansnick:we know participation from Africa, due to connectivity issues , 
is problematic
  Stephanie Perrin:agree, turn this rec into a review checkpoint would solve it.
  Chuck Gomes:+1 Stephanie
  Amr Elsadr:Are we also sending something to the GNSO Council?
  Rudi Vansnick:good question Amr
  Rudi Vansnick:i would suggest yes
  Amr Elsadr:@Jen: OK. Thanks.
  Rudi Vansnick:@Chuck +1
  Amr Elsadr:Isn't January when the Council will need to look at the CCWG recs 
as well?
  Stephanie Perrin:+1 Chuck!
  Larisa Gurnick:@Chuck, re: prioritization - OEC and the rest of the Board 
would be interested in hearing your thoughts on prioritization and work load.
  Stephanie Perrin:And in terms of the Westlake review, I would have expected 
the independent examiner to have prioritized better if they are giving us 36 
recommendations
  Marika Konings:The Council tentatively has two meetings in January, so maybe 
there is some room ;-)
  Amr Elsadr:Fantastic. :)
  Stephanie Perrin::-)  reading my mind Amr
  Amr Elsadr:Won't some of the recommendations we yellowed become green after 
we make modifications to them?
  Mary Wong:Thanks Jen!
  Amr Elsadr:I would say before the holidays.
  Amr Elsadr:We don't have much time, do we?
  Amr Elsadr:Sound advice Chuck. :)
  Stephanie Perrin:Totally agree with Chuck, wedging this in right now is going 
to be tough.  As far as staff is concerned, will they not be getting a new CEO 
soon as well?
  Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.
  Stephanie Perrin:Happy holidays to all if we don't talk before January!
  Rudi Vansnick:bye
  Larisa Gurnick:Thank you all very much for participating
  Chuck Gomes:Thanks all.