ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-review-dt]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Next Steps

  • To: "'gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-review-dt] GNSO Review - Next Steps
  • From: Charla Shambley <charla.shambley@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:13:42 +0000

Dear GNSO Review Working Party,

Members of the GNSO Review Working Party who participated in last week's call 
made significant progress and invite any other members of the Working Party to 
provide feedback on its Report "Feasibility Assessment and Prioritization of 
Recommendations" by close of business on 24 February.   This is in preparation 
for submitting the attached report to the GNSO Council for consideration at the 
9 March meeting.  We will schedule a tentative call from 16:00-17:00 UTC on 25 
February to discuss the feedback from the Working Party, should it be needed.

The attached document contains two worksheets (and is also available on the 
wiki<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56138570>): the 
first worksheet is the Executive Summary, the second worksheet sorts the 
recommendations based on the Working Party's evaluation of several criteria:


*         Ease or difficulty of implementation

*         Cost of implementation

*         Whether it is aligned with the strategic direction of the GNSO

*         Whether it impacts existing work or other work

The Working Party categorized each of the recommendations in two parts.  Part 
One addressed whether the group agreed with the recommendation of the 
independent examiner (13 recommendations), did not agree (3 recommendations), 
agreed with modifications (6 recommendations) or determined that work was 
already underway in the GNSO (14 recommendations).  Part Two prioritized the 
recommendations as high, medium or low in terms of the impact it could have on 
the GNSO.

The spreadsheet is sorted by priority so you will see high priority 
recommendations first, medium priority recommendations in the second tier, and 
low priority or do not implement recommendations toward the bottom.

Below is an updated timeline:

[cid:image003.png@01D1631A.2B0B5EC0]
I look forward to your feedback by close of business on 24 February.

Regards,

Charla

Charla K. Shambley
Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives Program Manager
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA  90094
mobile: 310-745-1943

PNG image

Attachment: GNSO Review Rec Prioritization - 3Feb2016.xlsx
Description: GNSO Review Rec Prioritization - 3Feb2016.xlsx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy