<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-review-dt] RE: Consideration of GNSO Review Recommendations
- To: "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx>, Jen Wolfe <jwolfe@dotbrand360.agency>
- Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Consideration of GNSO Review Recommendations
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 15:43:50 +0000
Thanks Larisa. I will watch for the questions.
Chuck
From: owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 10:41 AM
To: gnso-review-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Jen Wolfe
Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Consideration of GNSO Review Recommendations
Dear Jen and members of the GNSO Review Working Party,
The Board is getting ready to take action on the GNSO Review Recommendations
along with the substantial analysis and feedback from all of you and others in
the GNSO. As you can see from the update below, the work of your group has
been combined with feedback from the GNSO Council and other community members
to provide the Organizational Effectiveness Committee with a full picture. OEC
members have some questions for the Working Party and staff will compile and
circulate these questions within the next day.
Update on the Board's consideration of the GNSO Review Recommendations
Following the GNSO Council's adoption of the GNSO Review Working Party's
recommendations (see James Bladel's transmittal
letter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/bladel-to-abdul-rahim-27apr16-en.pdf>
to Rinalia Abdul Rahim, dated 27 April 2016), Staff has put together a Summary
of GNSO Review Recommendations for OEC Consideration (attached). The purpose of
this document is to provide the Committee with a complete overview of all
pertinent information in connection with the GNSO Review Recommendations. At
their next meeting on 15 May, the Committee will discuss the GNSO Review
recommendations with the objective of formulating the Committee's
recommendation to the Board. Jen Wolfe will be present to answer Committee's
questions and provide clarification on the work of the Working Party.
The document contains the Recommendations of the Independent Examiner, the
feedback from the GNSO Review Working Party (including implementation
priority), and a description of work already underway. In addition, community
feedback and comments concerning implementation are summarized in Annex A. This
feedback is the result of a webinar held on 12 April 2016
(transcript<http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-gnso-review-12apr16-en.pdf>
and recording<http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-12apr16-en.mp3>) and of
the GNSO Council call held on 14 April 2016
(transcript<http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-council-14apr16-en.pdf>
(p.21 onwards) and
recording<http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-14apr16-en.mp3> (0:47:19
onwards)).
Next steps
1. OEC Committee members are reviewing all the materials and staff is
compiling their questions for the Working Party. We will circulate these
questions within the next day to give you sufficient time to develop responses.
As always, staff is available to assist you.
2. Once the OEC has discussed this matter, the Committee will make a
recommendation to the ICANN Board for its consideration. Staff currently
anticipates that the Board will be able to deliberate the GNSO Review
Recommendations during its meeting in Helsinki.
3. Finally, with a view to the forthcoming implementation process, the
GNSO Council requested ICANN policy staff to 'prepare a discussion paper that
outlines the possible options for dealing with the implementation of the GNSO
Review recommendations following adoption by the ICANN Board, taking into
account the past implementation of the GNSO Review as well as existing
mechanisms such as the SCI, the GNSO Review Working Party and other applicable
best practices and lessons learned from past reviews.' The plan will take
into consideration the views of the Council as well as those by the OEC and the
Board, and address various elements essential for an effective and efficient
implementation process. These elements include: prioritization of
recommendations in line with GNSO and ICANN capacity; clear articulation of
expected outcomes from implementation; and definition of means to measure
effectiveness of implementation.
If you have any further questions or require clarifications, please do not
hesitate to reach out at any time.
Thank you for your enormous effort and contribution to making the GNSO Review
an effective accountability mechanism.
All the best,
Larisa B. Gurnick
Senior Director, Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives
Mobile: 1 310 383-8995
Skype: larisa.gurnick
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|