Re: [gnso-rn-wg] second try IANA and ICANN-related names

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

The question I have related to IANA reserved names is what the  
reaction would be to the ISOC BOT, IAB or IESG asking that another  
name be added to the reserved list.  For example, if they were to ask  
IANA to add IASA, or IAD to the reserved list (surprised they haven't  
yet), would IANA accept such a request and what would the process be?
To go further if an IETF WG  were to get an RFC approved that  
contained a set of new suggested reserved names, how would this be  
handled.  Or, if the IESG were to request that the names such as IETF- 
Routing (or IETF-xxx where xxx = any wg name or area name), would  
that be accepted automatically and by virtue of IANAs acceptance be  
granted addition to the official reserved names list?
Perhaps my question is whether we are talking about grandfathering in  
the current IANA list, or whether we are treating the IANA list as  
included by reference with additions up to IANA?
thanks.
a.



On 7 feb 2007, at 15.53, Timothy Denton wrote:

> The copy you received may have been imperfect. So we try again.
>
> --
> Timothy Denton, BA, BCL
> 37 Heney Street
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Canada K1N 5V6
> www.tmdenton.com
> 1 613 789 5397
> Eastern time zone
>
> <ICANN and IANA reserved names.doc>