Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Tagged Names, etc
- To: GNSO RN WG <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Tagged Names, etc
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:44:16 -0500
On 8 feb 2007, at 16.31, Patrick Jones wrote:
So far all we are doing is discussing what is on the existing
reserved names list(s). Once the background research has been done,
then the WG can debate what should and should not be on the list or
if changes should be made.
That goes to my last question:
When we say some topic is simple (i.e. low hanging fruit), are we
saying that a decision on
a. including the existing list of that category is a simple decision?
b. including the category as it may develop now and in the future is
a simple decision?
If b, then we cannot make evaluations of difficulty until after not
only the current state is described but until after the possible
evolution of the category is understood. This is why I argued that
all items on the list were currently of the moderately complex type