Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Tagged Names, etc

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,


On 8 feb 2007, at 16.31, Patrick Jones wrote:

> So far all we are doing is discussing what is on the existing  
> reserved names list(s). Once the background research has been done,  
> then the WG can debate what should and should not be on the list or  
> if changes should be made.

thanks.

That goes to my last question:

When we say some topic is simple (i.e. low hanging fruit), are we  
saying that a decision on

a. including the existing list of that category is a simple decision?
b. including the category as it may develop now and in the future is  
a simple decision?

If b, then we cannot make evaluations of difficulty until after not  
only the current state is described but until after the possible  
evolution of the category is understood.  This is why I argued that  
all items on the list were currently of the moderately complex type  
of issue.

a.