RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Additions to RN-WG?

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The latest request for membership in the RN-WG has been honored but it
is important to understand that it will be that person's responsibility
to come up to speed.  We will not be able to use time in our meetings on
issues that have already been covered.  We have less than four weeks to
finish our work so we will need to be very judicious in managing our
time.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: Sophia B [mailto:sophiabekele@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 9:17 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Additions to RN-WG?
        
        
        Chuck,
         
        I am not the person to restrict membership to any WG, parallel
to the issues we are having with membership to IDN WG.   However, I
would suggest the all WG would be covered by the same principles that
Bruce layed out before, until GNSO debate the issue.  
         
        Regards,
        Sophia
        
         
        On 23/02/07, Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

                The past two days, we have received two requests from
persons wanting to joint the RN-WG.  The first was from the RyC; I
discouraged it because we are so late in the process.  The second was
sent to Glen from an NCUC member. 
                 
                I would like to know what others in the group think.  At
this late stage is it possible to effectively integrate new people?  We
certainly do not have time to bring new people up to speed, so it would
be totally up to them to get up to speed on their own.  Please let me
know what you think? 
                 
                Chuck Gomes
                 
                "This message is intended for the use of the individual
or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."