RE: [gnso-rn-wg] RE: request to address single letter/two letter report early in the agenda

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Greg,

Names at the 3rd level are already fairly late in the agenda so it may
be okay.  If you are not on the call by the time we get to them, we will
skip 3rd level and come back to it when you join.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shatan, Gregory S. [mailto:GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:26 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ck@nic.museum; tina.dam@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] RE: request to address single 
> letter/two letter report early in the agenda
> 
> I will be joining the call late due to a business conflict.  
> If we can do names at the third level toward the end that 
> would be great.
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Device
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
> gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ram Mohan <rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Cary Karp 
> <ck@nic.museum>; Tina Dam <tina.dam@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thu Mar 01 08:51:23 2007
> Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] RE: request to address single 
> letter/two letter report early in the agenda
> 
> Assuming there are no objections, I will move the 
> single/2-character reserved names topic to the head of the 
> list of reports.  Note though that I already informed the IDN 
> experts that they will be early in the agenda so we do need 
> to do our expert consultation first.
>  
> Chuck Gomes
>  
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 
> under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or 
> disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> message in error, please notify sender immediately and 
> destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>  
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: Marilyn Cade [mailto:marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:40 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Ram Mohan'; 'Cary Karp'; 'Tina Dam'
> Subject: request to address single letter/two letter report 
> early in the agenda
> 
> 
> 
> I apologize but I must ask that the report from sub group 
> related to single and two character strings be done as early 
> in the meeting as possible and before 2 p.m.
> 
>  
> 
> I have a commitment that will take me away at 2 pm.
> 
>  
> 
> I confess that  I had expected this meeting to be changed due 
> to the conflict with the Council.  I can see that some of you 
> conspired to NOT have a conflict and stick with the original 
> time of 1-3 p.m. [that was intended as a joke! ] by lobbying 
> Bruce to cancel the Council call! [this is a joke!!!]. 
> 
>  
> 
> Nevertheless, I will need to drop off the call at 2 pm to go 
> off and save the world/Internet from ITUisms. Thus I fully 
> expect gratitude and cards, letters, smiley faces, and othe 
> appropriate gifts... - for that other challenging 'duty'. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> In the meantime, Chuck, I have emailed the rapporteur of the 
> sub group on single character/two character strings to ask 
> him to support going 'first', so that I can attend his report 
> of the sub group's work. I understand you want to have the 
> Ram/Tina discussion first, in any case, but would ask to have 
> the sub group on single character/two character report first. 
> 
>  
> 
> Marilyn 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> 
> From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 6:04 PM
> To: gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Ram Mohan; Cary Karp; Tina Dam
> Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Another Version of the Tagged Names Report
> Importance: High
> 
>  
> 
> After reviewing the latest Internet Draft by John Klensin, 
> dated 23 Feb 07, I made some additional edits to the RN-WG 
> Tagged Names report.  The latest changes are highlighted in 
> the attached file.  Please take a look at the changes before 
> our meeting tomorrow because we will likely make any final 
> edits in our meeting and take action to approve this report.  
> If you are unable to review the edits on this short notice, 
> please at least have this version available during our meeting.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Chuck Gomes
> 
>  
> 
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 
> under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or 
> disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> message in error, please notify sender immediately and 
> destroy/delete the original transmission." 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>