RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Whois, nic and www, version 9

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

<div>I can see no reason to resever those strings.&nbsp;Are there&nbsp;any 
tangible technical or stability related reasons to do it? Can't think of any 
myself. Perhaps&nbsp;Hyper Tension Medical Labs would like html.com someday if 
the current hosting provider using it should decide to give it up. All three 
are currently registered in .com and there are no issues with them that I am 
aware of.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>https.com since 1999 (monetized)</div>
<div>http.com since 1995 (not currently resolving)</div>
<div>html.com since 1993 (hosting company)<BR></div>
<div><BR>Tim Ruiz<BR>Vice President<BR>Corp. Development &amp; Policy<BR>The Go 
Daddy Group, Inc.<BR><A 
href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx";>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR>This email message and 
any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named 
herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If 
you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and 
permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its 
attachments.<BR><BR></div>
<div   name="wmMessageComp"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px 
solid">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Whois, nic 
and www, version 9<BR>From: Timothy Denton &lt;tim@xxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Date: 
Thu, March 08, 2007 10:32 am<BR>To: Reserved Names Working Group ICANN 
&lt;gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR><BR>This edition contains more comments from 
registry representatives on the <BR>three names and also raises the question of 
http, https, and html.<BR><BR>Should these three additional names be 
reserved?<BR>Should they be reserved for IANA or for registries?<BR><BR>-- 
<BR>Timothy Denton, BA, BCL<BR>37 Heney Street<BR>Ottawa, Ontario<BR>Canada K1N 
5V6<BR>www.tmdenton.com<BR>1 613 789 5397<BR>Eastern time zone 
</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>