RE: [gnso-rn-wg] note on terminology

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Might be a good idea. It might also be a good idea to use the terms
letter, digit, hypen when referring to subelements of the LDH set of
ASCII characters.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:07 PM
> To: GNSO RN WG
> Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] note on terminology
> 
> hi,
> 
> Now that we have gotten into using A-label and U-label from 
> draft- klensin-idnabis-issues-01.txt, i am wondering whether 
> we should also use the newly proposed term ldh-label.  Every 
> time we indicate ascii in one of the papers we are writing 
> there is still the ambiguity of whether we are referring to 
> ASCII with or without the ACE prefix (xn--).  Whereas 
> LDH-label has been defined to include those legal ASCII 
> labels that are not IDN labels.
> 
> Even if we don't do it throughout the documents, it might be 
> worth considering in those cases where there is ambiguity.
> 
> thanks
> a.
> 
>