RE: [gnso-rn-wg] nic, whois, www version 10 with attachement

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Tim.  It seems to me that it might be a good idea to add a
sentence to what you added regarding html, http and https, something
like the following: "Because reservation of names that this report
addresses (NIC, Whois, www) are for registry operational uses and
because there does not seem to be any identified registry operational
need for html, http and https, it is not recommended that html, http and
https be added to this category."

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Timothy Denton
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 7:00 PM
> To: Reserved Names Working Group ICANN
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] nic, whois, www version 10 with attachement
> 
> 
> This time with attachment.
> Timothy Denton wrote:
> > Slight changes of text.
> > No further work on http https and html is recommended.
> > The IDN formulation recommended by Cary Karp is retained: "Without 
> > translation as integral designators"
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Timothy Denton, BA, BCL
> 37 Heney Street
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Canada K1N 5V6
> www.tmdenton.com
> 1 613 789 5397
> Eastern time zone
> 
>