| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 [gnso-rn-wg] Issue regarding second level IANA and ICANN related names.
To: GNSO RN WG <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Issue regarding second level IANA and ICANN related names.From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:46:01 -0400 
 
hi,
The following is the wording regarding the position I stated in the  
meeting: 
---
These TLDs should be available to the appropriate organizations for  
registration; e.g. the IAB should be allowed register .iab or .irtf,  
ISOC should be able to register .ietf or .iesg and Afrinic should be  
able to register .afrinic - assuming, of course, they meet all the  
other requirements for registration and want to do so. 
The review, comment and challenge procedures that are being developed  
by the GNSO new gTLD process to deal with registration of a label by  
an entity that does not have the right to so register the label  
should be sufficient to prevent these names from being registered by  
organizations other then those who would have the right to do so. 
---
Note: the discussion of the reservation at the second and third  
levels should be subject to similar constraints as at the first  
level, though the processes for review and challenge would be different. 
Hence my view that this category requires further work.
a.
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |