<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-rn-wg] Issue regarding second level IANA and ICANN related names.
- To: GNSO RN WG <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Issue regarding second level IANA and ICANN related names.
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:46:01 -0400
hi,
The following is the wording regarding the position I stated in the
meeting:
---
These TLDs should be available to the appropriate organizations for
registration; e.g. the IAB should be allowed register .iab or .irtf,
ISOC should be able to register .ietf or .iesg and Afrinic should be
able to register .afrinic - assuming, of course, they meet all the
other requirements for registration and want to do so.
The review, comment and challenge procedures that are being developed
by the GNSO new gTLD process to deal with registration of a label by
an entity that does not have the right to so register the label
should be sufficient to prevent these names from being registered by
organizations other then those who would have the right to do so.
---
Note: the discussion of the reservation at the second and third
levels should be subject to similar constraints as at the first
level, though the processes for review and challenge would be different.
Hence my view that this category requires further work.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|