<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Report for Other Names at the 2nd Level
- To: "'Shatan, Gregory S.'" <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO RN WG'" <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Report for Other Names at the 2nd Level
- From: "Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:42:12 -0700
Greg,
To clarify your reference to .travel below, on the March 8 (if not earlier)
I mentioned that the Travel Partnership Corporation has been running a
comment period within their sponsored community on a potential premium name
auction. Information about the announcement and comment period is available
at http://www.ttpc.org/announce.htm. This has not yet been proposed to
ICANN, but it at least demonstrates that Tralliance has plans to potentially
allocate these names.
Patrick
_____
From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Shatan, Gregory S.
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 9:28 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; GNSO RN WG
Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Report for Other Names at the 2nd Level
As discussed on yesterday's call, please consider the following friendly
amendment to the this report, as follows, to be placed at the beginning of
section C.1:
These names differ from ICANN reserved names in that the names are actually
intended to be allocated by the Registries. Therefore, the names arguably
fall outside the remit of this particular Working Group. However,
allocation plans for these Registries are, in many cases, uncertain and have
no timing requirements. At least one registry (.travel) has indicated it has
no current plans to allocate these names. Thus, it is quite possible that
these names could remain unallocated for extremely long periods of time, and
become de facto reserved names. In order to avoid this result, registries
should be encouraged to have clear allocation plans with regard to these
names, including plans with regard to timing, with a goal to allocating
these names within a reasonable period of time. It may also be preferable
if these names were set forth in an Appendix and considered during the
approval process for the for the TLD.
Greg Shatan
Gregory S. Shatan
Partner
ReedSmithLLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
212.549.0275 (Phone)
917.816.6428 (Mobile)
212.521.5450 (Fax)
gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.reedsmith.com
This e-mail is confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have
received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents
to any other person. To do so could violate state and Federal privacy laws.
Thank you for your cooperation.
_____
From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:08 AM
To: GNSO RN WG
Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Report for Other Names at the 2nd Level
Assuming that no later version of this report is sent to the list before our
meeting today, we will use this version to discuss recommendations today.
Note that it appears that the full subgroup may not have reached consensus
on the recommendations but they will have opportunity to participate in the
discussion in our WG meeting. Also, note that the highlighted comments
under the recommendations for each of the three subcategories are my
comments for discussion in our call today.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and
destroy/delete the original transmission."
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|