Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Updated Controversial names report
Hi, On 13 mar 2007, at 15.00, Tim Ruiz wrote: Avri, did you get the version I sent with my comments edited? In any event, I changed the first paragraph to the text below but left the other two unchanged:The basis for my support of the straw recommendation is the desire that all applications for a new gTLD be evaluated against transparent and predictable criteria, fully available to the applicants prior to the initiation of the process, and that it is impossible for ICANN to pre-determine all terms that may be morally offensive or of national, cultural or religious significance for all of the world’s cultures and create predictable criteria for applicants. I did not get it, but have made the change you indicated in the attached. thanks a. Attachment:
Controversial_names_Report_draft_130307-5.doc
|