Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Updated Controversial names report

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

In this particular case, i surrendered completed.

We now use Denise's recomended wording and speak about 'some  
government's concerns'.  I have also, in this case, given into all  
pressure on even removing references to the publicly available copies  
of the draft and removed comments to the effect that we were forced  
to remove GAC quotes due to ICANN's enforcement of GAC polices on the  
behavior of an SO.  Tim also removed all mention of unmentionable GAC  
principles in his sections of the report.
I.e I think this report has now been scrubbed clean.

a.



On 13 mar 2007, at 17.14, marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Haven't seen edits. My advice was; We need to remove references to  
> the GAC principles. Use the phrase at Denise Michel provided. And  
> let's focus on improving the questions we may wish to see discussed  
> in a dialogue w the GAC. We are in the wkg relationship w GAC for  
> the long haul and we too need to be good 'partners' in discussions.  
> So we probably could bebefit from thought and planning for the  
> discussion in lisboa. :-)
> Regards,
> Marilyn Cade