RE: [gnso-rn-wg] consensus and minority statements

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am sending this again because I received a send error.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gomes, Chuck 
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 2:01 PM
> To: 'marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx'; owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx; Tim Ruiz
> Cc: gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] consensus and minority statements
> 
> We may.  To the extent that people can be flexible in that 
> regard, it would be appreciated.
> 
> Chuck Gomes
>  
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 
> under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or 
> disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> message in error, please notify sender immediately and 
> destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:02 PM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck; owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx; Tim Ruiz
> > Cc: gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] consensus and minority statements
> > 
> > One thought that occured to me --I recall that we were 
> cautious in the 
> > two rapporteur groups on PDP 06 not to rely on 'support' at the sub 
> > group level, but to focus on the support at the full TF.
> > 
> > I realoze that makes it essential for everyone to read and 
> understand 
> > all the reports/recommendations. So that brings to mind one 
> question-
> > 
> > Chuck, i am wondering if we will need an addtional 30 min 
> or so on the 
> > final call?
> > Regards,
> > Marilyn Cade
> >   
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:29:14
> > To:"Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc:<gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Thanks to Marilyn
> > 
> > Yes Tim.  I think that is correct, but the subgroups could 
> certainly 
> > apply the advice in finalizing their recommendations. You are also 
> > correct about the process.
> > 
> > Chuck Gomes
> >  
> > "This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
> entity to 
> > which it is addressed, and may contain information that is 
> privileged, 
> > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any 
> > unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly 
> prohibited. 
> > If you have received this message in error, please notify sender 
> > immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:13 AM
> > > To: Gomes, Chuck
> > > Cc: gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Thanks to Marilyn
> > > 
> > > I understood the direction about rough consensus to refer
> > to the WG as
> > > a whole. Is that correct? If so, then the sub-groups can
> > only comment
> > > on rough consensus regarding their particular group and its 
> > > recommendation. Rough consensus of the group would come after the 
> > > sub-groups are done and their work is reviewed. Is that 
> the process 
> > > we'll be following?
> > > 
> > > Tim
> > >  
> > > 
> > >  -------- Original Message --------
> > > Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Thanks to Marilyn
> > > From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Fri, May 04, 2007 7:00 am
> > > To: <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > >  I want to communicate special thanks to Marilyn for chairing the 
> > > meeting yesterday.  I sincerely appreciate that.  And I
> > also want to
> > > thank all of you for the work you are doing as we wrap up
> > our work.  
> > > As you are all aware, we are down to the wire and will 
> have a busy 
> > > next six days to wrap things up.
> > >  
> > > Please note that in cases where we were not able to
> > complete work or
> > > are not able to reach rough consensus, the Council gave us
> > direction
> > > in Lisbon that we should maintain the status quo until such
> > time that
> > > further work can be done.
> > > Please apply this direction as you finalize your 
> recommendations in 
> > > the subgroups.
> > >  
> > > I will provide more guidance after I listen to the MP3.  In the 
> > > meantime, if you have any questions, please let me know.
> > >  
> > > Chuck Gomes
> > >  
> > > "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity to
> > > which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
> > privileged,
> > > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any 
> > > unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
> > prohibited.
> > > If you have received this message in error, please notify sender 
> > > immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> >