Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Controversial Names Subgroup report

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

hi,

Thank you for normalizing the look and feel of the report.

Re the issue of removing the old recommendations.

For the most part, the content is included in the new  
recommendations.  I am not sure, however, that _all_ of the aspects  
are covered, and thus we may need to retain the original proposals or  
we may need to add the content into the current recommendation set.
The subgroup did, however, pretty much use those recommendations,  
having been supported originally but requiring more work, as the  
agreed upon base for the new recommendations.  Where we did make  
changes, e.g. the move away from requiring full consensus decisions  
from the ACs, those were explicit decisions and were discussed in the  
background section of the document
a.

On 9 maj 2007, at 08.57, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> <Subgroup Report for Controversial Names with Gomes edits 8 May.doc>