ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-stakeholder-charters]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

'constituency' appointments to Nominating Committee

  • To: gnso-stakeholder-charters@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: 'constituency' appointments to Nominating Committee
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:56:00 -0400

To the Board,

One issue that becomes apparent when comparing the 4 SG charters is that conditions for Nominating Committee membership will vary depending on SG. In some cases this will still be invested in the constituencies (CSG and NCSG), in one it is invested in Interest Groups (Registrars SG) and in one in the Executive Committee (Registry SG).

If the Board is making a decision to abolish the requirement for a constituency substructure to the Stakeholder Groupings, such as seems possible in the Contracted Parties House, then it seems that they must at the same time decide on how the seats in the nominating committee will be assigned and whether the methods proposed by the SGs are fair and equivalent. Specific issues that might arise concern the number of Interest Groups in the Registrars SG since they will not be Board approved, and the number of seats the Board may ask the Registry Executive Council to appoint.

Thank You

Avri Doria
Nominating Committee Appointee to GNSO Council (2005-1009)




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy