RE: [council] RE: [gnso-sti] Meeting Details for STI Review Team on Thursday Evening

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks to all three of you.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
        Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:01 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck
        Cc: Andrei Kolesnikov; Margie Milam; Council GNSO;
gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: [council] RE: [gnso-sti] Meeting Details for STI
Review Team on Thursday Evening
        
        
        Hi,
        Andrei, Terry and myself talked about this and we are ok with
Andrei being the NCA in the STI Review team.
        Regards
        Olga
        
        
        2009/10/28 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        

                That would be fine Andrei.  It is up to you, Olga and
Terry to decide.
                 
                Chuck


________________________________

                        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrei Kolesnikov
                        Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:39 AM
                        To: 'Margie Milam'; 'Council GNSO';
gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
                        Subject: [council] RE: [gnso-sti] Meeting
Details for STI Review Team on Thursday Evening
                        
                        

                        Should I propose myself as a NomCom rep into STI
team? I missed this one at the gNSO meeting today.

                         

                        --andrei

                         

                        From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
                        Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 9:19 AM
                        To: Council GNSO; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
                        Subject: [gnso-sti] Meeting Details for STI
Review Team on Thursday Evening
                        Importance: High

                         

                        Dear All,

                         

                        We have reserved the Astor Room on the 36th
Floor for a face to face meeting of the STI Review Team on Thursday,
October 29th from 5-6:30 pm.     As a reminder, each of the Stakeholder
Groups should identify their representatives to the Review Team in
accordance with the proposed motion that will be voted upon at the GNSO
Council meeting on Wednesday.   For your information, the proposed
motion is below.

                         

                        Best regards,

                         

                        Margie Milam

                         

                        Senior Policy Counselor

                        ICANN 
        
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

                         

                        WHEREAS, the ICANN Board has requested that the
GNSO evaluate certain ICANN staff implementation proposals for the
protection of trademarks in new gTLDs based in part on the
recommendations from the IRT, public comments, and additional analysis
undertaken by ICANN Staff, as described in the letter dated 12 October
2009 <<Letter from Rod Beckstrom & Peter Dengate Thrush to GNSO Council
<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/beckstrom-to-gnso-council-12oct09-
en.pdf> >>.

                         

                        WHEREAS, the ICANN Board letter requests the
GNSO's view by December 14, 2009 on whether certain rights protection
mechanisms for second level strings recommended by ICANN Staff based on
public input are consistent with the GNSO's proposed policy on the
introduction of new gTLDs, and are the appropriate and effective options
for achieving the GNSO's stated principles and objectives;

                         

                        WHEREAS, the GNSO has reviewed the ICANN Board
letter and desires to approve the procedures for conducting such
evaluation;

                         

                        NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the GNSO
adopts the following process to conduct the evaluation requested by the
Board:

                         

                        1.               A GNSO Review Team will be
comprised of representatives designated as follows:  the Registrar and
Registry Stakeholder Groups with two (2) representatives each,  the
Commercial Stakeholder Groups and the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups
with four (4) representatives each, and At-Large with two (2)
representatives and one representative from the Nominating Committee
Appointees(1);

                         

                        2.               Each of the Stakeholder Groups
will solicit from their members their initial position statements on the
questions and issues raised by the ICANN Board letter and the ICANN
Staff proposed models for the implementation of the Trademark
Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension model, and will deliver their
initial position statements on November 4, and with final position
statements to be delivered by November 6, 2009;

                         

                        3.               Such position statements will
be summarized by ICANN Staff and distributed to the GNSO Review Team to
evaluate whether a consensus can be reached on the ICANN Staff
implementation models or other proposals for the protection of
trademarks in the New gTLD Program; and

                         

                        The GNSO Review Team will conduct its analysis,
identify those areas where consensus has already been reached, an seek
to develop consensus on those issues for which consensus could not be
determined. The GNSO Review Team will provide a final report to the GNSO
on or before the GNSO council's meeting in late November, 2009.

                         




        -- 
        Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
        www.south-ssig.com.ar