ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-sti]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-sti] Question for ICANN staff on URS abuse

  • To: GNSO STI <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-sti] Question for ICANN staff on URS abuse
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:01:30 -0500


The Staff URS Proposal reads:

10.2 If a Complainant has been held to have filed abusive complaints on three occasions, the Complaint shall be barred from utilizing the URS for one-year following the date the last of the three Complaints was determined to be abusive. [Defining Abusive Complaints remains under consideration.]

Ignoring the typo in the second phrase where "Complaint" should be "Complainant", has there been any progress in the definition of "abuse" or the mechanism by which a Complaint would be "held to have filed [an] abusive complaint"?

Alan





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy