| <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 [gnso-sti] Question for ICANN staff on URS abuse
To: GNSO STI <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>Subject: [gnso-sti] Question for ICANN staff on URS abuseFrom: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:01:30 -0500 
 
The Staff URS Proposal reads:
10.2 If a Complainant has been held to have filed abusive complaints 
on three occasions, the Complaint shall be barred from utilizing the 
URS for one-year following the date the last of the three Complaints 
was determined to be abusive. [Defining Abusive Complaints remains 
under consideration.] 
Ignoring the typo in the second phrase where "Complaint" should be 
"Complainant", has there been any progress in the definition of 
"abuse" or the mechanism by which a Complaint would be "held to have 
filed [an] abusive complaint"? 
Alan
 
 <<<
Chronological Index
>>>    <<<
Thread Index
>>>
 
 |