<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-sti] Question for ICANN staff on URS abuse
- To: GNSO STI <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-sti] Question for ICANN staff on URS abuse
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:01:30 -0500
The Staff URS Proposal reads:
10.2 If a Complainant has been held to have filed abusive complaints
on three occasions, the Complaint shall be barred from utilizing the
URS for one-year following the date the last of the three Complaints
was determined to be abusive. [Defining Abusive Complaints remains
under consideration.]
Ignoring the typo in the second phrase where "Complaint" should be
"Complainant", has there been any progress in the definition of
"abuse" or the mechanism by which a Complaint would be "held to have
filed [an] abusive complaint"?
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|