RE: [gnso-sti] STI request to GNSO

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alan,
 
I didn't mean to imply either but was simply communicating what is
tentatively proposed at this time.  A Thursday meeting for the Council
seems to have worked pretty well but that doesn't mean it can't be
changed.  As you know we changed it to a Monday for our 23 Nov meeting.
We will discuss this in the 23 Nov meeting.  If the STI group wants to
provide some input in that regard, that would be good.  I would
discourage considering a change to the Council meeting date unless the
STI group is very confident that the STI work will be finished in time
to make the change worthwhile.  So if you and Zahid and other Councilors
who are on the STI could provide as much information as possible in that
regard, that would help a lot.
 
As you yourself pointed out, it is not just about the Council reviewing
any STI recommendations but Councilors will have to obtain input and
direction from their SGs and in your case the ALAC before they can make
any decisions.  Hopefully, STI reps are keeping their respective groups
informed along the way, but some time, probably at least a week, will be
needed for SG and ALAC review before the Council can act.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
        Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:51 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; GNSO STI
        Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] STI request to GNSO
        
        
        Chuck, should we take that to mean that you consider the 17th
sufficiently close to the Board deadline of Dec 14, or that you will
propose moving the meeting up a few days? Or neither.
        
        Alan
        
        At 11/11/2009 02:18 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
        

                Note that the Council December meeting is tentatively
planned for Thursday, 17 December.  Our meeting schedule is a key item
on the agenda for our 23 Nov meeting.
                 
                Chuck
                
                

________________________________

                        From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [
mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx> ] On
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
                        
                        Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:26 PM
                        
                        To: 'GNSO STI'
                        
                        Subject: Re: [gnso-sti] STI request to GNSO
                        
                        
                        Typically most councillors can only vote to
approve such a report if given at least a week's notice to consult with
their constituencies, perhaps leave the motion as is, but add that the
STI-RT intends to deliver its report no later than Monday, 7 December?
That tells the GNSO what the window is for a meeting.
                        
                        
                        Alan
                        
                        
                        At 11/11/2009 01:10 PM, Zahid Jamil wrote:
                        

                                Here is a draft of the final paragraph
of the status update of the STI with respect to 
                                
                                seeking more time from the GNSO:
                                
                                
                                  
                                
                                  
                                
                                  
                                Whereas the GNSO had passed a resolution
in its Public meeting at Seoul on 28th October 2009 stating that "The
GNSO [STI] review team will provide a final report to the GNSO on or
before the GNSO's council meeting in late November, 2009".  There is
consensus within the STI Review Team that the time available for
submission of a final report may not be adequate in order for the Review
Team to submit meaningful and efficacious report.  The Review Team
suggests that the next meeting of the GNSO be scheduled near enough the
deadline (14th of December 2009) set by the Board for submission of the
GNSO response, in order to provide the Review Team with adequate time to
effectively complete its review and submit a final report before the
date of the next GNSO meeting to be scheduled before the Board mandated
deadline.  
                                
                                
                                  
                                Please feel free to make suggestions.
Thanks.
                                
                                
                                  
                                
                                  
                                
                                  
                                
                                  
                                
                                  
                                Sincerely,
                                
                                
                                  
                                Zahid Jamil
                                
                                Barrister-at-law
                                
                                Jamil & Jamil
                                
                                Barristers-at-law
                                
                                219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
                                
                                Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
                                
                                Cell: +923008238230
                                
                                Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
                                
                                Fax: +92 21 5655026
                                
                                www.jamilandjamil.com
<http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> 
                                
                                
                                  
                                Notice / Disclaimer
                                
                                This message contains confidential
information and its contents are being communicated only for the
intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should
not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the
sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil,
Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information protected by
attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use,
amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts
(including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means
whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this
communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil &
Jamil is prohibited.