<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-sti] Non-verified marks
- To: GNSO STI <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-sti] Non-verified marks
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:09:46 -0500
I went to the IRT report to see how it treated the issue of marks
from jurisdictions that do not do any checking (for want of a better term).
Since the only language regarding sunrise is that, among other
things, the trademarks can be pulled by the registry, this seems to
imply that the registry can pull whatever marks it wishes, and is not
bound to use ALL of the TMs in the core database. There is no
restriction mentioned that such selectivity must be only based on the
class of service or on the charter of the registry. Can we not be as
silent on this as seemingly was the IRT report, and let registries
use the data however they wish.
I presume that this corresponds to how registries have performed
sunrises without the clearinghouse, specifically deciding for them
selves what types of marks to allow or disallow. Has anyone been sued
over such selectivity to date?
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|