RE: [gnso-sti] No contract between ICANN and UDRRP providers

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

That is correct and now you know why I insisted that the Clearinghouse
could not be operated this way and that strict contracts would be needed
not only for support reasons, but also to ensure that the data collected
is heavily regulated.  ICANN cannot afford to be hands off.

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy



________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jeff Eckhaus
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 4:14 PM
To: 'GNSO STI'
Subject: [gnso-sti] No contract between ICANN and UDRRP providers

 

I thought this is an interesting exchange and maybe some new
information, that ICANN does not enter into contracts with approved UDRP
providers. 

 

http://forum.icann.org/lists/cac-prop-supp-rules/msg00004.html