Re: [gnso-sti] ICANN requests for comments

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On the GNSO teleconference today, these new documents were briefly discussed.

There is a redline of the new proposal which is based on the original 
staff proposal. I asked for a statement of what had been implemented 
as per the STI report. I was told that the new proposal completely 
implements the STI report EXCEPT where it was perceived that the 
comments received warranted change, and that these changes were all 
discussed and clearly identified in the summary of comments on the 
STI report (also part of the document package just released I think). 
I have not had a chance to look at this comment summary to see how 
self-evident it is.
Alan

At 18/02/2010 11:04 PM, David W. Maher wrote:
> Members of the STI:
> ICANN has just posted for comment two revised documents relating to 
> the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure and the Trademark Clearinghouse.
> Available at:
> http://icann.net/en/public-comment/#urs
> I have not had a chance to review them thoroughly, but they discuss 
> the work of the STI.
> If you believe that the STI should comment on them, please respond 
> to this message.
> Thank you
> David