ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] For your review - updated charter

  • To: "'Marika Konings'" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Evan Leibovitch'" <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] For your review - updated charter
  • From: "Ray Fassett" <ray@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:17:47 -0400

Thanks Marika.


For the definitions of "thin" and "thick" whois as contained, I would ask
that we take into consideration and discuss how the words "store",
"manages", "maintains", and "provide" are used in these definitions so as to
avoid the possibility of different assumptions by different people.


My second comment relates to the recent change to "the consistent use of
thick whois" in that in other parts of the Charter reference "uniform"
whois.  I am not sure if the two are meant to mean the same.




From: owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 9:55 AM
To: Evan Leibovitch
Cc: Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] For your review - updated charter


Apologies, you are right, I attached the old version by mistake. Please find
attached the updated version.


With best regards,




From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday 17 September 2012 15:48
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] For your review - updated charter



On 17 September 2012 04:46, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

*       Included reference to information / advice provided by other ICANN


Sorry, but I don't see the wording that you and I agree upoin last week in
the new draft. Judging by the filename you may have attached an older draft.


- Evan


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy