Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] a modest amendment to our charter point on "privacy and data protection"

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Oct 15, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> How about this as a next pass
> 
> On 15 Oct 2012, at 08:49, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> 
>> Impact on rights: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect rights such as Privacy, 
>> Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Association as well as adherence to 
>> data protection regulations,  taking into account the involvement of 
>> different jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to 
>> data privacy as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?
>> 
> 
> 
> Impact on rights: how would ‘thick’ Whois specifically affect internationally 
> agreed rights, e.g. rights of others, privacy, freedoms such as expression 
> and association, as well as adherence to data protection regulations, taking 
> into account the involvement of different jurisdictions with different laws 
> and legislation with regard to data privacy as well as possible cross border 
> transfers of registrant data?
> 

just to put current and proposed versions in the same email note, here's the 
current language;

Impact on privacy and data protection: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect privacy 
and data protection, also taking into account the involvement of different 
jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy 
as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?

here's Avri's proposal;

Impact on rights: how would ‘thick’ Whois specifically affect internationally 
agreed rights, e.g. rights of others, privacy, freedoms such as expression and 
association, as well as adherence to data protection regulations, taking into 
account the involvement of different jurisdictions with different laws and 
legislation with regard to data privacy as well as possible cross border 
transfers of registrant data?
 

i'd like to encourage people to take a look at this revision and see if this is 
an acceptable middle ground.  thanks Avri, i appreciate your willingness to 
help move this along.  to restate a few points;

- i think it would be helpful if *we* could arrive at a mutually-agreeable 
place in advance of the Council meeting on Wednesday

- i'd ask us to focus on revisions to wording (thus refining a charter rather 
than actually doing the work of the WG)

thanks again,

mikey

PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP 
(ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)