Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] i've started drawing pictures -- here's the first one

[Rick Wesson <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Largely incorrect. There are not any definitions of personal data,
only registrant data. A proxy is often a subshell of the registrar
that preforms proxy functions for the 4 delivery mechanisms which are
postal, email, telephone and fax to reach one of the 4 potential
contact linked to a domain registration. Within the registrar they
function the same regardless of thick or thin whois style.

The escrow contains all the same data in the whois record, it is
encrypted and help in an archive for backup and business failure.

If there is business data that isn't in the whois document then
whatever business data you are referring to is also not escrowed or
specified as being required for publishing.

Could you please, rather than draw a picture, simply enumerate this
data elements of which you speak that "never finds its way into the
whois." Please, if you could also include a link to a contractual
document specifying said data should be published and escrowed.

thanks,
-rick



On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> i'm a big fan of pictures, especially in policy papers, because they give me
> a chance to think about things in a different way as i draw them.
>
> i've been rereading the comments-summary document that Marika, Berry and
> Lars prepared and realized that i think a lot of the issues that are being
> raised are about the handling of data that never finds its way into Whois.
> so here's a thick-Whois based drawing to illustrate that.  as with
> everything else i do, it's likely to be wrong until the rest of you hammer
> on it a little bit.
>
> hammer away.
>
> mikey
>
>
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>
>