Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] status of Registry and Registrar comments?

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

As was perhaps obvious, I was not answering the question Mikey asked, 
but the unspoken question of responding to the mindmap of recent 
e-mails that he sent out.
At 03/02/2013 09:39 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> Mikey, I didn't respond because to be honest, the that mindmap was 
> just too complex for me to follow. I will repeat part of what I said 
> in the original exchanges.
> If there are harms to registrants that we need to worry about we 
> need concrete examples or at least concrete hypotheticals.
> If there are laws which forbid specific registrars from carrying on 
> their existing business if we move to all registries to a thick 
> whois, let's have some specifics on the table.
> Alan
>
> At 02/02/2013 11:55 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> > is the hope of getting comments from either of those groups a pipedream?
> >
> > if either group is going to have comments ready, it would be REALLY 
> > helpful to have them by the end of the weekend so that Marika and 
> > her gang have a ghost of a chance of working them into the summary 
> > document in time for our meeting next Tuesday.
> > thanks,
> >
> > mikey
> >
> > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
> > <http://www.haven2.com>www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for 
> > Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)