Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Proposed agenda - 'thick' Whois PDP WG meeting
and i have it on good authority that the draft that's circulating amongst the Registries bears remarkable resemblance to the PIR submission, so we may be able to use that as a proxy for analysis. m On Feb 4, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Registrars will have input very shortly. > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote: > >> I would suggest that we put this WG on hold until we receive the replies >> from the Rr and Ry SGs. There is no practical way to go forward with the >> real work until we have those on file. Without those (or knowing that they >> are not coming) we really have no way to move forward. >> >> Alan >> >> At 04/02/2013 10:25 AM, Marika Konings wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's 'thick' Whois WG >>> meeting (Tuesday 5 February at 15.00 UTC). >>> >>> With best regards, >>> >>> Marika >>> >>> Proposed Agenda - 'thick' Whois PDP WG Meeting of 5 February 2013 >>> Roll Call / SOI >>> Update on status of sub-teams and next steps >>> Review work plan >>> Update on SG/C statements received to date & input from other SO/ACs – >>> Start review of comments received to date (see public comment review tool) >>> Next steps & confirm next meeting > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
smime.p7s
|