Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures

[Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>]

Rick,

I don't agree that we can ignore a discussion of the possibility of data
losses, although we don't need to go into depth on analyzing security
measures.

The legal details are TBD as the data protection group gets to work.

Don

On 2/10/13 9:10 PM, "Rick Wesson" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Don,
>
>
>> The question for me basically is:
>>
>> Does requiring a move from a thin to a thick registry raise issues
>>concerning 1) data loss through hack or inadvertent disclosure or 2)
>>clashes with data protection laws? Both questions need to be considered
>>during transfer and when the data is in the registry's Whois.
>
>In the hopes of keeping this all on track could you enumerate how
>these relate to the charter? data -loss though hacking does not appear
>to be within our remit. Data protection lwas is as broad as there are
>geo-political regions. could you tighten up your constraints and
>provide concrete examples of both the laws, country of origin,
>implications, and matrix that into a graphic our chair might grok.
>
>starting timer....
>
>thanks,
>
>-rick