ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures

  • To: Rick Wesson <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures
  • From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:05:35 -0500

I don't know that the issues are that clear cut. We'll be discussing them in 
the data protection subteam.

From: Rick Wesson 
<Rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, February 11, 2013 12:06 PM
To: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@xxxxxxx<mailto:dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>>
Cc: Mikey O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Thick Thin PDP 
<gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures

Don,

> 1) data loss through hack or inadvertent disclosure

Could you define "inadvertent disclosure" when the data is *always* available 
globally via :43 and :80 not to mention in bulk?

I have a difficultly understanding how this data is "hackable" when its freely 
available. Finally, how could "data loss" be a factor as the data effectively 
is published. How could it possibly become lost or hacked. I can't seem to 
think of an example of either, could you provide one of each?

thanks,

-rick


On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Don Blumenthal 
<dblumenthal@xxxxxxx<mailto:dblumenthal@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
Rick,

I don't agree that we can ignore a discussion of the possibility of data
losses, although we don't need to go into depth on analyzing security
measures.

The legal details are TBD as the data protection group gets to work.

Don

On 2/10/13 9:10 PM, "Rick Wesson" 
<rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

>Don,
>
>
>> The question for me basically is:
>>
>> Does requiring a move from a thin to a thick registry raise issues
>>concerning 1) data loss through hack or inadvertent disclosure or 2)
>>clashes with data protection laws? Both questions need to be considered
>>during transfer and when the data is in the registry's Whois.
>
>In the hopes of keeping this all on track could you enumerate how
>these relate to the charter? data -loss though hacking does not appear
>to be within our remit. Data protection lwas is as broad as there are
>geo-political regions. could you tighten up your constraints and
>provide concrete examples of both the laws, country of origin,
>implications, and matrix that into a graphic our chair might grok.
>
>starting timer....
>
>thanks,
>
>-rick






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy