ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures

  • To: "Rick Wesson" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:17:35 -0700

<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><div>Rick, if your not confused, your not&nbsp;paying 
attention ;-)</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Seriously, I agree with Rick for the most part. And why does this need to 
become so complicated. I think Rick lays it very clearly.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div><BR>"Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it. 
Geniuses remove it." Alan Perlis&nbsp; </div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Tim Ruiz</div>
<div>Director, Policy Planning<BR><a href="http://GoDaddy.com";>GoDaddy.com</a> 
LLC</div>
<div>Email: <a href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx";>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</a><BR>&nbsp;</div>
<div>This email message and any attachments hereto are intended for use only by 
its intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you have 
received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and 
permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its 
attachments.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 8px; FONT-FAMILY: 
verdana; COLOR: black; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=replyBlockquote 
webmail="1">
<DIV id=wmQuoteWrapper>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: Re: 
[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures<BR>From: Rick Wesson &lt;<a 
href="mailto:rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;<BR>Date:
 Fri, February 08, 2013 4:07 pm<BR>To: "Mike O'Connor" &lt;<a 
href="mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx";>mike@xxxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;<BR>Cc: Thick Whois WG 
&lt;<a 
href="mailto:gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx</a>&gt;<BR><BR>Systems
 Boundaries seems reasonable, the others are rubbish. We should stay focused -- 
your images don't help constrain our discussion to facts and observations 
directed by our charter. I've included a chart to help guide your thoughts, 
please consider it.<BR><BR>-rick<BR><FONT face="courier new, monospace">&nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
+----------------------+<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; Recomend Thick &nbsp; &nbsp; |<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; Whois &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; +----------------------+<BR>&nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;+ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp;+<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;| &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;| 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;+-----+ | &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;| No &nbsp;|&lt;+ &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;+--+--+ &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; v<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;+---------------+<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;| &nbsp; YES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; |<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;| 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;| &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; |<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp;+------+--------+<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; v<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; +------------------+<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | 
&nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; +----&gt;| &nbsp; &nbsp; Why? &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; |<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; | &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;|<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; +------------------+<BR>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<BR></FONT><BR>On Fri, Feb 
8, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Mike O'Connor &lt;<A href="mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx"; 
target=_blank>mike@xxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt; wrote:<BR>&gt; hi all,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; 
Avri and i had a great conversation this week over, dare i say it, a 
series<BR>&gt; of pictures. &nbsp;the version we arrived at is included in this 
deck, along with<BR>&gt; another one that Berry Cobb created for the RAP 
working group that shows the<BR>&gt; various contracts between parties in the 
process.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; as with all pictures, this is still a work in progress 
and i'm sure it will<BR>&gt; morph a few more times before we're done. 
&nbsp;let me lay down a few<BR>&gt; disclaimers. &nbsp;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; -- 
these aren't a representation of WG positions. &nbsp;the one that Avri and 
i<BR>&gt; were working on was just a vehicle for a useful (at least for 
me)<BR>&gt; conversation. it's not even representative of *our* positions. 
&nbsp;think of it<BR>&gt; as more a thought exercise and 
question-raiser.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; -- all the good ideas are Avri's, all the bad 
ideas are mine.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; -- there are assertion/questions in there that 
we didn't know the answers<BR>&gt; to. &nbsp;we made them during our 
conversation but mostly we're interested in the<BR>&gt; views of others who 
have more expertise.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; -- Berry's drawing about contracts has 
been reviewed by ICANN legal, so<BR>&gt; there's more meat there -- although 
it's aimed at a slightly different<BR>&gt; target than ours and thus 
privacy/proxy providers aren't represented. &nbsp;it<BR>&gt; would be 
interesting to see where they fit.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; enjoy,<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; 
mikey<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; &nbsp;<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 
866-280-2356, WEB: <A href="http://www.haven2.com/"; 
target=_blank>www.haven2.com</A>, HANDLE:<BR>&gt; OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, 
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; 
</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></span></body></html>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy