<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] New RAA relevant section
- To: "Volker Greimann" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Thick Whois" <gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] New RAA relevant section
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:29:51 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Right. I think we discussed that already, no registrar
port 43 for thin registries. So, if all registries are thick there would
no longer be a port 43 requirement.<BR></div>
<div>Or were you pointing out something different?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Tim</div>
<div> </div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 8px; FONT-FAMILY:
verdana; COLOR: black; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt" id=replyBlockquote
webmail="1">
<DIV id=wmQuoteWrapper>-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject:
[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] New RAA relevant section<BR>From: Volker Greimann
<<a
href="mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>><BR>Date:
Tue, April 23, 2013 11:45 am<BR>To: Thick Whois <<a
href="mailto:gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx</a>><BR><BR>Dear
Team members,<BR><BR>the new RAA has a small change on one issue which may be
relevant to our discussions:<BR><BR>3.3 Public Access to Data on
Registered Names. During the Term of this Agreement: <BR>3.3.1 At its expense,
Registrar shall provide an interactive web page <B>and, with respect to any
gTLD operating a “thin” registry, a port 43 Whois</B><B><BR></B><B>service</B>
(each accessible via both IPv4 and IPv6) providing free public
query-­‐based access to up-­‐to-­‐date (i.e., updated at
least daily) data<BR>concerning all active Registered Names sponsored by
Registrar in any gTLD. (...)<BR><BR><BR>Best,<BR><BR>Volker
Greimann<BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|