[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] MP3 THICK WHOIS meeting - 27th August 2013 at 1400 UTC

[Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

The next  Thick Whois PDP Working Group call will be held on Tuesday at 03 
September 2013 at 1400 UTC.

Please find the MP3 recording of the Thick Whois PDP Working Group call held on 
Tuesday 27th August 2013 at 14:00 UTC at:

http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-thick-whois-20130827-en.mp3

On page:  
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#mars>apr>aug

The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master 
Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/


Attendees:
Volker Greimann - RrSG
Carolyn Hoover - RySG
Steve Metalitz - IPC
Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP
Marc Anderson - RySG
Frederic Guillemaut - RrSG
Avri Doria - NCSG
Tim Ruiz - RrSG
Amr Elsadr - NCSG
Marie-Laure Lemineur - NPOC
Christopher George - IPC
Don Blumenthal - RySG

Apologies:
 Alan Greenberg - ALAC


ICANN staff:
Glen de St Gery
Berry Cobb
Nathalie Peregrine

** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Mailing list archives:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg/

Wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/x/whgQAg

Thank you.
Kind regards,
Nathalie Peregrine
For GNSO Secretariat

Adobe Chat Transcript for 27th August 2013:


  Nathalie  Peregrine:Welcome to the Thick Whois WG Meeting of 27 August 2013

  Amr Elsadr:Just joined the call.

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Welcome!

  Amr Elsadr:Good luck Mikey.

  Don:Good luck GNSO

  Amr Elsadr::)

  marie-laure lemineur:congratulation !

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Roy Balleste sends his apology for today's call

  steve metalitz:This point was discussed several times before.  Look forward 
to seeing any specific suggestions for changes to the report on this.

  Volker Greimann:Apologies for being late

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Frederic Guillemaut has joined the call

  Nathalie  Peregrine:Avri Doria has joined the call

  Amr Elsadr:intercontinental hotels group

  steve metalitz:Agree with the IHG comment but not sure it is in scope for us.

  Amr Elsadr:I'm pretty sure it isn't. :)

  Volker Greimann:I agree with Steve in that this is wiothout our scope

  Don:I don't see the relevance either.

  Berry Cobb:It will be a PDP as a result of the negotiations

  Tim Ruiz:Marc is correct, it is in the RAA...

  steve metalitz:Agree with Tim re ending with "by the community."

  Avri Doria:So it really needs to be multistakeholder lead

  Avri Doria:But the registrants have the privacy liability

  Tim Ruiz:"registrants have the privacy liability," absolutely agree.

  Tim Ruiz:doesn't our comment that we just modified in 25 apply to this as 
well, these issues need to be explored in more depth?

  Don:yes to Tim

  steve metalitz:Re #26, what is Patrick asking us to include in the report?

  Tim Ruiz:Besides, hasn't ICANN indemnified everyone involved? Oh, never mind 
;-)

  Volker Greimann:you wish, Tim ;-)

  Tim Ruiz:@Volker, yeah, I had it backwards.

  Volker Greimann:actually, I do to, but wishes are like dreams

  Volker Greimann:too

  Volker Greimann:^_^

  Avri Doria: IIts

  Don:Mikey, you just started echoing on my end.

  Don:I don't think we need to add it. It will come from decisions concerning 
how much data protection issues apply.

  Don:It = evaluation of Safe Harbor

  steve metalitz:Agree with Tim's comments

  Amr Elsadr::)

  Volker Greimann:sec

  Volker Greimann:I think the comments are valid concerns, however they should 
not impact our conclusion and recommendations

  Marc Anderson:yes, I agree they are vailid, but I feel as though we've 
already addressed them in our report.

  Don:To reinforce, a list is pointless because the landscape is changing and 
much broader than just the European requirements.

  Don:Pointless may be too strong but I think it's beyond the WG scope, the 
focus has been too limitedm and any list may not be valid by the time tha the 
issues are examined

  Tim Ruiz:Just for the record, while my comment about ICANN idemnification 
seemed flippant, it is a concern in regards to the data privacy issue and the 
fact that registrants, registries, and registrars all fully idemnify ICANN in 
various agreements should be a concern discussed in any subsequent work on the 
privacy issue.

  Tim Ruiz:Thanks Mikey!

  Volker Greimann:agreed, tim

  Amr Elsadr:Thanks Mikey.

  Volker Greimann:Thanks mikey

  marie-laure lemineur:thanks