Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] notes from the call today
hi Avri, could you unpack that "end-to-end" dependency term a bit? the sense i had was that it means "it's fine to do implementation activities in parallel, but make sure the legal stuff is OK before the final decision to cut over" -- is that right? mikey On Sep 24, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I do have a question about the scheduling of the Legal investigation and the > Prep for transition: > > Was it acceptable that these have an end-end dependency? > > thanks > > avri > > On 24 Sep 2013, at 15:17, Mike O'Connor wrote: > >> hi all, >> >> as promised, here are my notes from the call this morning. i'd put these in >> the "getting there" category and would like to commend everybody for a >> pretty good piece of work. i'm attaching two versions. the first is the >> document exactly as it was when the call ended -- errors, mistyping and all. >> the second one is my attempt to tidy up errors, refine the language AND add >> some "all due speed" language to the recommendation. we can certainly >> discuss this on the list, but we'll also take up the topic again on the call >> next week. >> >> see what you think. >> >> mikey >> >> <Thick Whois -- Proposal - WG 24-sept.doc> >> >> >> <Thick Whois -- Proposal - WG 24-sept v2.doc> >> >> >> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: >> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) >> > > PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) Attachment:
smime.p7s
|