Proposed GNSO Top Level Implementation Plan

["Ivey, Christopher" <ChristopherI@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Sir,

How do you propose to demonstrate to public stakeholders that the Top Level 
Implementation Plan is not merely a scheme to generate huge amounts of 
registration revenues and monies from bidding wars as entities scramble to 
protect trademarks and intellectual property?

Icann is clearly failing to represent the public interest.  No one could 
possibly think that this was a good idea or that the implementation plan is 
mature.  This plan will almost certainly result in an unprecidented wave of 
litigation, spoofing, fraud and illegal activity related to securing namespace. 
 It will confuse and alienate ordinary consumers.

It will put consumers at risk, since it will increase the scope for namespace 
expoits, fishing, and spoofing.

What real, concrete benefit can you demonstrate as a result of this change?

Chris Ivey