ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-trans-pdp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-trans-pdp] RE: [gnso-trans-wg] Posting of Initial Report regarding Transfers Policy PDP

  • To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-trans-pdp] RE: [gnso-trans-wg] Posting of Initial Report regarding Transfers Policy PDP
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:31:14 -0400

Works for me Olof.  The different formats threw me off in trying to
locate each statement.  It doesn't seem to me that the formats matter
that much as long as the content is unchanged.  If it is decided to
leave the formats unchanged, then I would suggest that a title be added
for each one that is in the main document format and is linked to the
ToC.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:11 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-trans-wg] Posting of Initial Report regarding
Transfers Policy PDP

Hi Chuck,
Indeed, that's correct, no new constituency statements materialized...

As to the format of the constituency statements in the report, I have
deliberately kept them in the original in order to fully capture them as
submitted. I have done so earlier as well (DT Outcomes Report, DT
Initial Report...). I thought that people would be satisfied to
recognize their submissions exactly as delivered, but I realize that
there may be other considerations - what do others think?

As to the TOC, well, I could add another layer for the next time around.

Best regards

Olof

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: den 17 mars 2008 16:54
To: Olof Nordling; gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-trans-wg] Posting of Initial Report regarding
Transfers Policy PDP

Thanks Olof.  I assume that the ISCPC did not submit their statement and
the NCUC did not submit a revised statement that relates directly to the
PDP terms of reference.

If possible bfore posting, I would suggest that the Constituency
Statements be consistently formatted so they are easier to find and that
their page numbers be added to the Table of Contents.  I found it
difficult to find them for each constituency when I tried scrolling for
them.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:46 AM
To: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] Posting of Initial Report regarding Transfers
Policy PDP

Dear all,
Attached is the Initial Report for the Transfers Policy PDP on
clarification of four reasons for transfer denials. It will shortly be
posted on the GNSO site and the ICANN site for public comments.

Very best regards

Olof




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy