Re: [gnso-trans-wg] Short term planning group - Transfers Review
- Subject: Re: [gnso-trans-wg] Short term planning group - Transfers Review
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:50:02 -0400
Hello all -
I think that we have a relatively small workload to deal with and can
probably deal with our task in a relatively lightweight fashion.
I would like to propose the following approach to our work.
a) everyone independently review the following document http://
gnso.icann.org/drafts/Transfer-Policy-Issues-23aug07.pdf (Oct 25 -
b) comments, questions and clarifications back to the list for
discussion (Oct 25 - November 10).
c) each participant independently prioritizes the work items outlined
in the aforementioned document (a uniform template will be provided)
d) I will merge all of the prioritized list into a draft "master"
list (November 15)
e) teleconference to discuss and agree on final "master" list and
contents of communication back to Council. (sometime during the third
week of November based on availability)
Does this sound like a reasonable approach to everyone?
Thanks for volunteering for this effort.
On 24-Oct-07, at 6:20 PM, GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Pursuant to the Council resolution passed at the meeting on 20
i) Whereas the GNSO Working Group on Inter-registrar Domain
Transfers Policy Review (Transfers WG) has completed its work, and;
ii) Whereas, the Transfers WG has provided a series of reports to
the GNSO Council for its consideration,
Be it resolved that;
i) The GNSO Council will issue the working group report entitled
"Advisory Concerning Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy" for
constituency and community review and comment for a period of no
less than 14 days, and;
i.a) pursuant to this comment period, all material commentary will
be summarized and reviewed by Council
i.b) pursuant to the review by Council that the current, or an
amended form of this report be provided to Staff for posting to the
ICANN web site as a community advisory.
ii) Pursuant to section 1.b of Annex A of ICANN's Bylaws, that the
GNSO Council initiate the formal GNSO Policy Development Process by
requesting the creation of an issues report evaluating issues
raised by the working group document "Points of Clarification Inter-
Registrar Transfer Policy.
iii). That the GNSO Council form a short-term planning group to
analyse and prioritize the policy issues raised in the report
"Communication to GNSO on Policy Issues Arising from Transfer
Review" before the Council further considers a PDP on any of the
work discussed in the report.
The short-term planning group has been formed with the following
participants under the leadership of Ross Rader:
Ross Rader - Registrar
Thomas Keller - Registrar
Tim Ruiz - Registrar
Barbara Steele - Registry
Ken Stubbs - gTLD Registry C
Pamela Miller - gTLD Registry C
Christian Curtis - NCUC
Paul McGrady - IPC
Stacey King - IPC
Mike O'Connor - CBUC
ICANN Staff support
Olof Nordling - Manager, Policy Development Coordination
Karen Lentz - gTLD Registry Liaison
Glen de Saint Gery - GNSO Secretariat
The Inter-Registrar Transfer policy: Clarification for reasons for
denial of a Transfer Request Issues Report can be viewed directly at:
The mailing list for the group is
public archives may be viewed at:
Please let me know if you are aware if anyone has been left off the
Thank you very much.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
Director, Retail Services
"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen