RE: [gnso-trans-wg] Some thoughts on approach regarding the transfer issues

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Interesting idea Olof.  I will try to find some time to explore it
further.  I need to review the priorties document again.

Chuck 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 11:45 AM
To: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] Some thoughts on approach regarding the
transfer issues


Dear all,
Having re-read the document from Ross' prioritization committee (at
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/irdx-policy-priorities-20dec07.pdf ) I just
wanted to share some thoughts with you:

1. According to a statement at the end of the paper "those issues
scoring 8 or higher enjoy the broadest support from the committee". That
would imply that issues 1 - 5 are in that group.

2. We could consider this top group in the listed order and see if any
issue therein could usefully be grouped with any other issue with lower
priority with a view to a PDP. Perhaps, for example, that issue 1 could
be grouped with issue 7?

3. Then such "PDP embryos" could be further considered from the
perspectives of, for example, a) potential importance to the
registrants, b) likelihood of reaching consensus, c) cost/ease of
implementation of a possible outcome etc - and, low and behold, a
proposed PDP running order would emerge like magic (?).

Just my three Euro-cents to start our discussions...

Best regards

Olof