[gnso-trans-wg] FW: Transfers prioritization - a very small question...
Hi all, Regarding the "CT" issue, I just got confirmation from a most authoritative source - Ross himself - that this is a typo, see below. Accordingly, let's skip CT and use Consensus Ranking whenever we need to, in order to stay consistent with the prio group's vocabulary. Best regards Olof -----Original Message----- From: Ross Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: den 12 mars 2008 18:54 To: Olof Nordling Subject: Re: Transfers prioritization - a very small question... Hi Olof - I would guess that this is a typo that may have crept in somewhere. The group I worked with only discussed the "consensus rankings" - I don't have any recollection of anything that looked like "CT". Hope this helps! -ross On Mar 12, 2008, at 1:43 PM, Olof Nordling wrote: > Hi Ross, > A small group of volunteers is currently finalizing the work of > suggesting groupings of the "remaining" transfers issues, based on > your groups priority settings. In that work, we reference your > Consensus Rankings of the individual issues, but somehow they have > seeped into our document as, for example, CT 6.0, where I wonder > whether "CT" is just a misprint for "CR" or has some other > significance. I suppose the former, as I cannot find "CT" in your > earlier documents, but I would appreciate your confirmation or > comments on that. > > Thanks > > Olof