Greg et al,
I suggest to send the table to the council list by tomorrow and ask
each constituency to send their info by no later than Tuesday 20 of
January.
Olga
2009/1/14, Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>:
Olga et al,
If all of us can agree on this approach, I guess the next
step would be to set a deadline and announce (on the Council email
list) that each constituency is asked to submit its list of
candidates for travel support (and what kind - full, hotel-only or
flight-only) by that date.
Greg
From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>; Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:50:15 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico
City meeting
I fully agree with your comments Greg.
Regards
Olga
2009/1/14, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>:
That seems like a perfectly sensible approach.
Stéphane Van Gelder
Le 14/01/09 16:18, « Greg Ruth » <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
We seem to have general agreement to something like the table Tim
and Olga have provided. We now have about a week to go till the 22
January deadline.
Unless there is further discussion, perhaps a good way to proceed
would to be to call for each constituency to put forward by some
date (say Friday or Monday) its list of candidates for Mexico City
travel support. We can then see what that adds up to and where we
stand (i.e. whether it all evens out, or we need more slots than
ICANN is providing). Does this seem like a sensible approach?
Greg
From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>; gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx;
Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>; Olga Cavalli
<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:42:57 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico
City meeting
Hi,
I have drafted a small table containing the name of constituencies
and the funded travellers in Cairo and Tim proposal for Mexico, I
also added in the right a column with the possible total funded
travellers per constituency.
We should exchange ideas fast as constituencies must decide by Jan
22nd.
Have a good week and regards to all.
Olga
Constituencies Cairo meeting Mexico meeting Tim Proposal Total per
constituency
NCUC 2 2 4
ISPC 1 2 3
RyC 1 2 3
BC 3 1 4
RrC 1 2 3
IPC 1 2 3
Total 9 11 20
2009/1/9, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,
Thanks Tim and Greg for starting the exchange of ideas again.
Glen, could you please add Stephane Van Gelder to this drafting
group?, as requested yesterday on the call.
Should we need to set up a date/time for conference call or just
work online on the list?
Regards and have a nice weekend!
Olga
2009/1/8 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> We might want to give preference to those constituencies
> that used fewer slots last time.
How about this:
NCUC ˆ 2
ISPC ˆ 2
RyC ˆ 2
BC ˆ 1
RrC ˆ 2
IPC ˆ 2
Then leave it up to the constituencies whether or not to split up the
funds. They could either fund two people fully or one full and two
split. The BC (who had three fully funded last time) could fund one
fully or one for airfare and a second for the lodging per diem.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-travel-dt] ICANN travel support for the Mexico City
meeting
From: Greg Ruth <greg_ruth@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, January 08, 2009 3:16 pm
To: gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx
All,
I would observe that ICANN funded travel support for the Cairo
meeting (excluding NCAs) was as follows.
Gross, Robin - NCUC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
Harris, Tony - ISPC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
Hoover, Carolyn - RyC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
Jamil,Zahid - BC Financial Need - Economy
Klein, Norbert - NCUC - Financial Need - Economy
Rossette, Kristina - IPC - Financial Need - Expenses Only
Rodenbaugh, Mike - BC - Constituency 1st choice - Economy
Sheppard, Philip - BC - Complies with ICANN policy - Economy
Walton, Clarke - RrC - Constituency 1st choice ˆ Economy
That is, the GNSO constituencies used the following numbers of travel
support "slots" (for a total of 9):
NCUC ˆ 2
ISPC ˆ 1
RyC ˆ 1
BC ˆ 3
RrC ˆ 1
IPC ˆ 1
Therefore, out of the 20 slots allotted by ICANN for consituency
travel
to the Cairo and Mexico City meetings, theoretically 11 are still
available for travel to the Mexico City meeting.
We might want to give preference to those constituencies that used
fewer
slots last time.
Greg