RE: [gnso-udrp-dt] Action Items from Today's Call
- To: "'UDRP DT'" <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-udrp-dt] Action Items from Today's Call
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:47:00 +0200
Sorry I was unable to be with you after all on the call last week and apologies
in advance for next. All options are no go for me due travel.
However on the survey, it is very - how can I say it? - comprehensive.
As someone who is asked weekly to answer surveys, it is a bit demanding.
Demanding surveys get low reply rates.
Do we really need such delineation at this stage ?
Cant we group some of this Q1 options?
And the free text questions after that will result in a variety of quality of
I would advocate converting this into a form that is shorter, user friendly and
For the Q 1 a form that does some of the maths eg % would be good.
Maybe you discussed this - and we should all know this is not the final format.
If so apologies.
Hope these comments help.