<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
- From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:08:59 -0400
I also think that we should not necessarily have a panel approach to the
presentation. I believe we should have the staff do a short presentation on
the preliminary issues report and throw out questions to those in attendance.
For example, I heard some great views by people last week at a private
registrar event on the UDRP, none of which were reflected by the last panel or
in the staff paper. For example, some of them were concerned that the
registrars who liberally interpret the UDRP would not follow any type of
voluntary best practices and would only benefit from consensus policies and
strict enforcement of those policies. That can only be done through a PDP.
On the other hand, if you do have a panel, I would love to moderate and ask the
tough questions ;)
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:01 PM
To: Margie Milam; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
Just a question and it may be too late to ask, but why are we asking some of
the same exact people to present that presented in the webinar? It seems to
me that hearing different perspectives may be helpful particularly in light of
the recommendations of the staff report.
Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address: 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:34 PM
To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP
Dear All,
I just want to provide you with the feedback I received regarding the UDRP
Session. As discussed, I reached out to the Webinar panelists to see if they
have an interest in participating in the Session. The following have expressed
an interest:
NAF- Kristine Dorrain
WIPO- David Turner Roche
CAC- Petr Hostas
Academic- Konstantinos Komaitis
Panelists- David Bernstein and Neil Brown
Registrars- Statton Hammock
Also, separately Susan Kawaguchi of Facebook expressed an interest in
participating as a panelist.
I recommend that all of them participate, as this would be a good cross-section
of perspectives. I need let them know ASAP, so please respond by COB tomorrow
if you object to this approach.
Thanks,
Margie
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|