Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP

[<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for suggesting me, Tim - if the rest of the team thinks it may be
better to have me (academic, GNSO Council) moderate instead of Jonathan
(who may be perceived by some in the GNSO/ICANN community to be from the
TM/rights-holder community), I'd be happy to do so. 
 
(but I won't take it personally if folks prefer to go with Jonathan :)
 
As for Susan Kawaguchi, since David Bernstein will not be in Singapore,
would we want to consider her as a panelist? Or would that stir up the
"we need more broadly representative Registrants" hornet's nest?
 
Cheers
Mary

 
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law
Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAWTwo White StreetConcord, NH
03301USAEmail: mary.wong@xxxxxxx.eduPhone: 1-603-513-5143Webpage:
http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.phpSelected writings available on
the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> 


From: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:"Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>,
<owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"'krosette@xxxxxxx'" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'"
<gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 6/8/2011 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session
on the UDRP
Perhaps Mary would be willing to moderate?
From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx> 
Sender: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx 
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:20:52 -0700
To: Neuman, Jeff<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>;
'krosette@xxxxxxx'<krosette@xxxxxxx>;
'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'<gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on
the UDRP


Hi-  I thought it would be better if I am not moderator for the same
reason, so we should think about who might be  a good moderator for this
session.  
 
On a separate note,  David Bernstein decided not to come to Singapore
after all.
 
Margie
 

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:32 PM
To: 'krosette@xxxxxxx'; 'gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Re: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on
the UDRP

 
Thanks. 

FyI - I was kidding about me being the moderator thing. On the other
hand, it may be better to have someone other than the author of the
report serve as the moderator so that Margie could answer questions
related to the Staff paper.



Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
Vice President, Law & Policy 
NeuStar, Inc. 
Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx 


 
From: Rosette, Kristina [mailto:krosette@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 06:53 PM
To: Neuman, Jeff; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx <gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the UDRP 
 

We had planned for the panel portion to be less than 1/2 of the
allotted time (according to my notes) and I would be A-OK with limiting
the panelists to reacting to the Staff recommendations, namely:  (1)
whether they agree with or have other suggested approaches for dealing
with a review of the UDRP; (2)  whether  they have additions to the list
of issues described in Annex 2; (3)  whether they would recharacterize
any of the issues as “policy” or “process” issues.  Provided we stick to
that limitation, I think it's valuable to get the input from these folks
who were considered to have meaningful contributions before.   
 
Given the location and time difference issue, we'll need to include
questions posted ahead by those who can't attend and can't participate
remotely in real time.
 
If the persons who made those comments at the private registrar event
on the UDRP want to rise them in the session, they will certainly be
able to do so.  
 
As for moderator, I prefer that we stick with Margie.
 


 

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:09 PM
To: Neuman, Jeff; Margie Milam; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on
the UDRP
I also think that we should not necessarily have a panel approach to
the presentation.  I believe we should have the staff do a short
presentation on the preliminary issues report and throw out questions to
those in attendance.  For example, I heard some great views by people
last week at a private registrar event on the UDRP, none of which were
reflected by the last panel or in the staff paper.  For example, some of
them were concerned that the registrars who liberally interpret the UDRP
would not follow any type of voluntary best practices and would only
benefit from consensus policies and strict enforcement of those
policies.  That can only be done through a PDP.  

On the other hand, if you do have a panel, I would love to moderate and
ask the tough questions ;)
 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166    

 


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
 

 

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:01 PM
To: Margie Milam; gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] RE: Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on
the UDRP

 
Just a question and it may be too late to ask, but why are we asking
some of the same exact people to present that presented in the webinar? 
  It seems to me that hearing different perspectives may be helpful
particularly in light of the recommendations of the staff report.
 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
Please note new address:  21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling VA 20166    

 


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.
 

 

From: owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:34 PM
To: gnso-udrp-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-udrp-dt] Update on the Singapore Meeting Session on the
UDRP

 
Dear All,
I just want to provide you with the feedback I received regarding the
UDRP Session.   As discussed, I reached out to the Webinar panelists to
see if they have an interest in participating in the Session.  The
following have expressed an interest:
 
NAF- Kristine Dorrain 
WIPO- David Turner Roche 
CAC- Petr Hostas
Academic- Konstantinos Komaitis
Panelists-  David Bernstein and Neil Brown
Registrars-  Statton Hammock
 
Also, separately Susan Kawaguchi of Facebook expressed an interest in
participating as a panelist.
 
I recommend that all of them participate, as this would be a good
cross-section of perspectives.   I need let them know ASAP, so please
respond by COB tomorrow if you object to this approach.
 
Thanks,
Margie