ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-vi-feb10] Updated Draft VI Charter

  • To: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Updated Draft VI Charter
  • From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:49:15 -0800

Dear all,

Attached is the updated draft charter that reflects the changes discussed in 
our call today and further developed over email.   Brian Cute and I still need 
to further refine the definitions, but hopefully you can reach consensus on the 
language of the objectives.

Best Regards,



Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:05 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] proposed rewording of Objective 5 - resend

(sent during the meeting but from the wrong address and it was rejected)

The friendly amendment:

Using all information that has been collected by ICANN to date determine 
whether ...


On 17 Feb 2010, at 13:46, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> Objective 5: To determine whether the changes to the current restrictions 
> and/or practices concerning registry-registrar separation and equal access 
> contained in the options set out in DAGv3 constitute an unacceptable 
> deviation from current policies regarding registry-registrar sewparation.
> Rationale: this does not require research or an open-ended assessment of the 
> entire registry-registrar market, but a simple determination that the DAGv3 
> proposals are an unauthorized policy change. 
> --MM

Attachment: VI DT Charter SVG V9.docx
Description: VI DT Charter SVG V9.docx

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy