RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: proposed rewording of Objective 5

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I actually question the term "unacceptable". 
Are we looking more for material changes since we do not have standard or 
acceptable contract in place? 
Maybe substitute the term "material" for "unacceptable" in the last sentence of 
Objective #5? 

If unacceptable has a specific meaning maybe that can be explained

Thanks

Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:41 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: proposed rewording of Objective 5


Makes sense to me too.

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
http://rodenbaugh.com


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:00 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: proposed rewording of Objective 5


Hi,

Restrictions and practices makes sense to me since they are part of what
defines a de-facto policy.

a.

On 17 Feb 2010, at 16:47, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> 
> Margie;
> I agree with "current and past" but no, I don't think I can agree to
adding "restrictions and practices." As GNSO we are interested only in
consistency with policy, not with "practices and restrictions". I view that
as a tendentious change.  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Margie Milam [mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:46 PM
>> To: Milton L Mueller; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: proposed rewording of Objective 5
>> 
>> Milton,
>> 
>> I suggest rewording Objective 5 slightly to replace the term "current
>> policies" with "current and past restrictions and practices" to be
>> consistent with the other objectives and our prior discussions.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Margie
>> 
>> ___________
>> 
>> Margie Milam
>> Senior Policy Counselor
>> ICANN
>> ___________
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 11:46 AM
>> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] proposed rewording of Objective 5
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Objective 5: To determine whether the changes to the current restrictions
>> and/or practices concerning registry-registrar separation and equal
access
>> contained in the options set out in DAGv3 constitute an unacceptable
>> deviation from current policies regarding registry-registrar sewparation.
>> 
>> Rationale: this does not require research or an open-ended assessment of
>> the entire registry-registrar market, but a simple determination that the
>> DAGv3 proposals are an unauthorized policy change.
>> 
>> --MM
> 
>