<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Updated VI Charter for review by SG/Constituencies
- To: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] RE: Updated VI Charter for review by SG/Constituencies
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:40:42 +0100
Noted, thanks for this Jeff.
Stéphane
Le 24 févr. 2010 à 20:39, Jeff Eckhaus a écrit :
> All,
>
> I have consulted with the Registrars Stakeholder Group on this charter and
> there is overwhelming support for Objective # 5 as put forward by the NCSG
> (Milton/Avri)
>
> Objective 5: Using all information that has been collected by ICANN to date,
> determine whether the changes to the current restrictions and/or practices
> concerning registry-registrar separation and equivalent, non-discriminatory
> access contained in the options set out in the most recent version of the DAG
> and supporting documents constitute a material deviation from current and
> past restrictions and practices regarding registry-registrar separation.]
>
> There were a few members who did not support Objective # 5 at all, and felt
> this Objective should be deleted, but for the sake of compromise may
> grudgingly support the Objective # 5 above.
>
> There was unanimous objection to Objective # 5 as put forth by the IPC.
>
> There were no additional comments on the other Objectives at this time
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Jeff
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|