RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5

[Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>]

Stéphane-  I'll do that today and send it around.


Best,
Margie

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:32 AM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5


Yes, we seem to have a deadlock situation right now with the NCSG and the RrSG 
supporting the Milton/Avri Obj 5 and the BC and the IPC supporting the Kristina 
Obj 5.

This could be resolved by the RySG coming out in support of one version or the 
other, but it's now past deadline and there hasn't been a reaction from the 
registries.

Brian, could you let us know which version the registries support please?

I would then suggest we move ahead as we had planned to: the majority takes it. 
I would also suggest, as this is pretty evenly split up, that a not be included 
in the charter explaining which version of obj 5 was supported by whom. This 
could then be sent back to Council as-is, and for them to make a final 
determination.

Margie, were you able to act on Avri's earlier proposal to bring the proposed 
agenda inline with recent developments? Do you have a definitive version of the 
charter that I can take back to the Council?

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 25 févr. 2010 à 15:48, Avri Doria a écrit :

> 
> 
> Hi
> 
> so how do we resolve this split in the consensus?
> 
> does the council vote on the version of Objective 5 they like best?
> or does the charter linger in the DT until we reach a consensus?
> 
> if the later, who can suggest a compromise wording?
> 
> a.
>