Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Got it!

Le 25 févr. 2010 à 18:37, Brian Cute a écrit :

> Please confirm if this email was received on list.  Thank you.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:38 AM
> To: briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Avri Doria'; Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5
> 
> Thanks Brian.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 25 févr. 2010 à 16:36, Brian Cute a écrit :
> 
>> Stephane,
>> 
>> Collecting comments as we speak.  Should be able to offer a reaction
>> shortly.  Apologies for missing the deadline.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:32 AM
>> To: Avri Doria
>> Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Objective 5
>> 
>> 
>> Yes, we seem to have a deadlock situation right now with the NCSG and the
>> RrSG supporting the Milton/Avri Obj 5 and the BC and the IPC supporting
> the
>> Kristina Obj 5.
>> 
>> This could be resolved by the RySG coming out in support of one version or
>> the other, but it's now past deadline and there hasn't been a reaction
> from
>> the registries.
>> 
>> Brian, could you let us know which version the registries support please?
>> 
>> I would then suggest we move ahead as we had planned to: the majority
> takes
>> it. I would also suggest, as this is pretty evenly split up, that a not be
>> included in the charter explaining which version of obj 5 was supported by
>> whom. This could then be sent back to Council as-is, and for them to make
> a
>> final determination.
>> 
>> Margie, were you able to act on Avri's earlier proposal to bring the
>> proposed agenda inline with recent developments? Do you have a definitive
>> version of the charter that I can take back to the Council?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> Le 25 févr. 2010 à 15:48, Avri Doria a écrit :
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> so how do we resolve this split in the consensus?
>>> 
>>> does the council vote on the version of Objective 5 they like best?
>>> or does the charter linger in the DT until we reach a consensus?
>>> 
>>> if the later, who can suggest a compromise wording?
>>> 
>>> a.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>